From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
jeremy@goop.org, hugh@veritas.com, mingo@elte.hu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@redhat.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] lockdep: lock protection locks
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:03:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080804131012.161572745@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080804130317.994042639@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: lockdep-nest-lock.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 9432 bytes --]
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 16:26 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > Taking more than a few locks of the same class at once is bad
> > news and it's better to find an alternative method.
>
> It's not always wrong.
>
> If you can guarantee that anybody that takes more than one lock of a
> particular class will always take a single top-level lock _first_, then
> that's all good. You can obviously screw up and take the same lock _twice_
> (which will deadlock), but at least you cannot get into ABBA situations.
>
> So maybe the right thing to do is to just teach lockdep about "lock
> protection locks". That would have solved the multi-queue issues for
> networking too - all the actual network drivers would still have taken
> just their single queue lock, but the one case that needs to take all of
> them would have taken a separate top-level lock first.
>
> Never mind that the multi-queue locks were always taken in the same order:
> it's never wrong to just have some top-level serialization, and anybody
> who needs to take <n> locks might as well do <n+1>, because they sure as
> hell aren't going to be on _any_ fastpaths.
>
> So the simplest solution really sounds like just teaching lockdep about
> that one special case. It's not "nesting" exactly, although it's obviously
> related to it.
Do as Linus suggested. The lock protection lock is called nest_lock.
Note that we still have the MAX_LOCK_DEPTH (48) limit to consider, so anything
that spills that it still up shit creek.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
include/linux/lockdep.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
include/linux/rcuclassic.h | 2 +-
kernel/lockdep.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -1372,18 +1372,32 @@ check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr,
struct lockdep_map *next_instance, int read)
{
struct held_lock *prev;
+ struct held_lock *nest = NULL;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < curr->lockdep_depth; i++) {
prev = curr->held_locks + i;
+
+ if (prev->instance == next->nest_lock)
+ nest = prev;
+
if (hlock_class(prev) != hlock_class(next))
continue;
+
/*
* Allow read-after-read recursion of the same
* lock class (i.e. read_lock(lock)+read_lock(lock)):
*/
if ((read == 2) && prev->read)
return 2;
+
+ /*
+ * We're holding the nest_lock, which serializes this lock's
+ * nesting behaviour.
+ */
+ if (nest)
+ return 2;
+
return print_deadlock_bug(curr, prev, next);
}
return 1;
@@ -2507,7 +2521,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lockdep_init_map);
*/
static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
int trylock, int read, int check, int hardirqs_off,
- unsigned long ip)
+ struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip)
{
struct task_struct *curr = current;
struct lock_class *class = NULL;
@@ -2566,6 +2580,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep
hlock->class_idx = class - lock_classes + 1;
hlock->acquire_ip = ip;
hlock->instance = lock;
+ hlock->nest_lock = nest_lock;
hlock->trylock = trylock;
hlock->read = read;
hlock->check = check;
@@ -2717,7 +2732,7 @@ found_it:
if (!__lock_acquire(hlock->instance,
hlock_class(hlock)->subclass, hlock->trylock,
hlock->read, hlock->check, hlock->hardirqs_off,
- hlock->acquire_ip))
+ hlock->nest_lock, hlock->acquire_ip))
return 0;
}
@@ -2778,7 +2793,7 @@ found_it:
if (!__lock_acquire(hlock->instance,
hlock_class(hlock)->subclass, hlock->trylock,
hlock->read, hlock->check, hlock->hardirqs_off,
- hlock->acquire_ip))
+ hlock->nest_lock, hlock->acquire_ip))
return 0;
}
@@ -2915,7 +2930,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_set_subclass);
* and also avoid lockdep recursion:
*/
void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
- int trylock, int read, int check, unsigned long ip)
+ int trylock, int read, int check,
+ struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip)
{
unsigned long flags;
@@ -2930,7 +2946,7 @@ void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lo
current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
__lock_acquire(lock, subclass, trylock, read, check,
- irqs_disabled_flags(flags), ip);
+ irqs_disabled_flags(flags), nest_lock, ip);
current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
}
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/lockdep.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ struct held_lock {
u64 prev_chain_key;
unsigned long acquire_ip;
struct lockdep_map *instance;
+ struct lockdep_map *nest_lock;
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_STAT
u64 waittime_stamp;
u64 holdtime_stamp;
@@ -297,7 +298,8 @@ extern void lockdep_init_map(struct lock
* 2: full validation
*/
extern void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
- int trylock, int read, int check, unsigned long ip);
+ int trylock, int read, int check,
+ struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip);
extern void lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested,
unsigned long ip);
@@ -319,7 +321,7 @@ static inline void lockdep_on(void)
{
}
-# define lock_acquire(l, s, t, r, c, i) do { } while (0)
+# define lock_acquire(l, s, t, r, c, n, i) do { } while (0)
# define lock_release(l, n, i) do { } while (0)
# define lock_set_subclass(l, s, i) do { } while (0)
# define lockdep_init() do { } while (0)
@@ -407,9 +409,9 @@ static inline void print_irqtrace_events
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
# ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-# define spin_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, i)
+# define spin_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, NULL, i)
# else
-# define spin_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, i)
+# define spin_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, NULL, i)
# endif
# define spin_release(l, n, i) lock_release(l, n, i)
#else
@@ -419,11 +421,11 @@ static inline void print_irqtrace_events
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
# ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-# define rwlock_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, i)
-# define rwlock_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 2, 2, i)
+# define rwlock_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, NULL, i)
+# define rwlock_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 2, 2, NULL, i)
# else
-# define rwlock_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, i)
-# define rwlock_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 2, 1, i)
+# define rwlock_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, NULL, i)
+# define rwlock_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 2, 1, NULL, i)
# endif
# define rwlock_release(l, n, i) lock_release(l, n, i)
#else
@@ -434,9 +436,9 @@ static inline void print_irqtrace_events
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
# ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-# define mutex_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, i)
+# define mutex_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, NULL, i)
# else
-# define mutex_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, i)
+# define mutex_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, NULL, i)
# endif
# define mutex_release(l, n, i) lock_release(l, n, i)
#else
@@ -446,11 +448,11 @@ static inline void print_irqtrace_events
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
# ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-# define rwsem_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, i)
-# define rwsem_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 1, 2, i)
+# define rwsem_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 2, NULL, i)
+# define rwsem_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 1, 2, NULL, i)
# else
-# define rwsem_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, i)
-# define rwsem_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 1, 1, i)
+# define rwsem_acquire(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 0, 1, NULL, i)
+# define rwsem_acquire_read(l, s, t, i) lock_acquire(l, s, t, 1, 1, NULL, i)
# endif
# define rwsem_release(l, n, i) lock_release(l, n, i)
#else
@@ -461,9 +463,9 @@ static inline void print_irqtrace_events
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
# ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-# define map_acquire(l) lock_acquire(l, 0, 0, 0, 2, _THIS_IP_)
+# define map_acquire(l) lock_acquire(l, 0, 0, 0, 2, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
# else
-# define map_acquire(l) lock_acquire(l, 0, 0, 0, 1, _THIS_IP_)
+# define map_acquire(l) lock_acquire(l, 0, 0, 0, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
# endif
# define map_release(l) lock_release(l, 1, _THIS_IP_)
#else
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/rcuclassic.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/rcuclassic.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/rcuclassic.h
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ extern int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
# define rcu_read_acquire() \
- lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map, 0, 0, 2, 1, _THIS_IP_)
+ lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map, 0, 0, 2, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
# define rcu_read_release() lock_release(&rcu_lock_map, 1, _THIS_IP_)
#else
# define rcu_read_acquire() do { } while (0)
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-04 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-04 13:03 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 13:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] lockdep: Fix combinatorial explosion in lock subgraph traversal Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-05 8:34 ` David Miller
2008-08-05 8:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-13 3:48 ` Tim Pepper
2008-08-13 10:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-04 13:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] lockdep: lock_set_subclass - reset a held locks subclass Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-05 8:35 ` David Miller
2008-08-04 13:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] lockdep: re-annotate scheduler runqueues Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-05 8:35 ` David Miller
2008-08-04 13:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] lockdep: shrink held_lock structure Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-05 16:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-06 7:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 13:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] lockdep: map_acquire Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-08-04 13:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] lockdep: spin_lock_nest_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 14:07 ` Roland Dreier
2008-08-04 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 14:26 ` Roland Dreier
2008-08-04 14:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 14:53 ` Dave Jones
2008-08-04 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 16:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 16:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 17:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 17:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 17:57 ` [PATCH] workaround minor lockdep bug triggered by mm_take_all_locks Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 18:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 18:56 ` Roland Dreier
2008-08-04 19:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 20:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 20:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 21:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 21:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-04 21:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 21:41 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-04 22:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 21:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-04 22:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 23:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-05 0:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 21:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-04 21:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 21:57 ` David Miller
2008-08-05 2:00 ` Roland Dreier
2008-08-05 2:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-05 12:02 ` Roland Dreier
2008-08-05 12:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-04 18:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] lockdep: spin_lock_nest_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 21:32 ` David Miller
2008-08-04 18:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-04 18:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 19:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-04 19:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-04 19:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 20:16 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-08 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-08 15:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-08 16:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-08 16:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-08 16:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-10-08 15:52 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-08 17:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-07 11:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-07 11:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/7] lockdep: annotate mm_take_all_locks() Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-07 11:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/7] mm: fix mm_take_all_locks() locking order Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-07 12:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-08-07 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-07 13:27 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-08-07 21:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-08 1:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-08-08 7:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-11 10:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080804131012.161572745@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox