From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758362AbYHDQRA (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 12:17:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756033AbYHDQQp (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 12:16:45 -0400 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:12980 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755734AbYHDQQo (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 12:16:44 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,305,1215388800"; d="scan'208";a="1278214" Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:16:26 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault To: Andreas Schwab Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext3 seems to ignore ECC errors Message-ID: <20080804161626.GZ4470@implementation.uk.xensource.com> Mail-Followup-To: Samuel Thibault , Andreas Schwab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20080804150353.GS4470@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <20080804154727.GV4470@implementation.uk.xensource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Aug 2008 16:16:26.0559 (UTC) FILETIME=[720034F0:01C8F64D] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andreas Schwab, le Mon 04 Aug 2008 18:12:54 +0200, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault writes: > > > Andreas Schwab, le Mon 04 Aug 2008 17:39:06 +0200, a écrit : > >> Samuel Thibault writes: > >> > However, to my surprise Linux (2.6.26) continued to mount the ext3 > >> > filesystem read/write, spitting out a lot of IDE errors. Shouldn't > >> > filesystems remount read-only and let the admin try to save data in such > >> > case? > >> > >> That's a tunable parameter of the filesystem, see tune2fs(8). > > > > Oh, I had assumed it was on by default, hum. But now it reads > > > > Errors behavior: Remount read-only > > > > and I am still getting the same behavior. Indeed after some VFS > > modifications time it gets remounted read-only, but shouldn't that > > happen as soon as possible? > > The block device may do some retries before passing the error on. Sure. But I forgot to mention that after spitting all these write errors, the filesystem remains mounted read-write. Samuel