From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext3 seems to ignore ECC errors
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 12:51:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080804165156.GI8592@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080804154727.GV4470@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 04:47:27PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Andreas Schwab, le Mon 04 Aug 2008 17:39:06 +0200, a écrit :
> > Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> writes:
> > > However, to my surprise Linux (2.6.26) continued to mount the ext3
> > > filesystem read/write, spitting out a lot of IDE errors. Shouldn't
> > > filesystems remount read-only and let the admin try to save data in such
> > > case?
> >
> > That's a tunable parameter of the filesystem, see tune2fs(8).
>
> Oh, I had assumed it was on by default, hum. But now it reads
>
> Errors behavior: Remount read-only
>
> and I am still getting the same behavior. Indeed after some VFS
> modifications time it gets remounted read-only, but shouldn't that
> happen as soon as possible?
Errors writing to data blocks should get reflected up the application
(i.e., as EIO errors), but it won't force the filesystem read/only or
force a kernel panic (in the "tune2fs -e panic" case). The rationale
being if it's a single isloated error writing to a single file, why
ruin everybody's day by taking more drastic action?
But if we can't write to core filesystem data structures, that's a
much more serious situation....
- Ted
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-04 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-04 15:03 ext3 seems to ignore ECC errors Samuel Thibault
2008-08-04 15:20 ` Samuel Thibault
2008-08-04 15:39 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-08-04 15:47 ` Samuel Thibault
2008-08-04 16:12 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-08-04 16:16 ` Samuel Thibault
2008-08-04 16:51 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080804165156.GI8592@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox