From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763688AbYHDV4X (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:56:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764762AbYHDVtM (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:49:12 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50917 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755419AbYHDVtK (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:49:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:46:27 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Greg KH , Justin Forbes , Zwane Mwaikambo , "Theodore Ts'o" , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , Chris Wedgwood , Michael Krufky , Chuck Ebbert , Domenico Andreoli , Willy Tarreau , Rodrigo Rubira Branco , Jake Edge , Eugene Teo , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [patch 01/25] ftrace: remove unneeded documentation Message-ID: <20080804214627.GA8840@suse.de> References: <20080804203506.816201392@mini.kroah.org> <20080804212932.GA8014@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 05:42:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > > 2.6.26-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > Well, I object to this patch, but I'm sure I'll be ignored. Why? There is no ftrace code in the 2.6.26 kernel, so why would we worry about keeping such documentation up to date, let alone even present at all? Why should this matter? thanks, greg k-h