From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765324AbYHDWDx (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:03:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764669AbYHDWDH (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:03:07 -0400 Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:4945 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764647AbYHDWDE (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:03:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:54:39 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04 Message-ID: <20080804215439.GA9658@tuxdriver.com> References: <20080804193753.GA30345@tuxdriver.com> <1217882288.7819.19.camel@californication> <20080804204558.GA5866@tuxdriver.com> <1217886123.7819.23.camel@californication> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1217886123.7819.23.camel@californication> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:42:03PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > > > Luis R. Rodriguez (4): > > > > list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init() > > > > list.h: add list_cut_position() > > > > > > have these two changes got reviewed on LKML? I don't see any ACKs for it > > > in the commit message. > > > > Hmmm...no. I thought the original patches had been copied to > > linux-kernel, but it looks like that is not the case. > > > > The original patches are archived here: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783421908441&w=2 > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783422008445&w=2 > > > > What problems do you see with them? > > I don't see a problem with these patches, but they should at least be > reviewed on LKML once. Changes to core kernel infrastructure should not > be merged silently via subsystem trees without any kind of ACKs. Yes, fine. That wasn't my intent. :-) The patches were originally posted about two weeks ago, too bad that didn't actually go to linux-kernel. :-( John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com