From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [BISECTION RESULT] sched: revert cpu_clock to pre-27ec4407790d075c325e1f4da0a19c56953cce23 state
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:34:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080805173447.GD7812@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1217926585.3589.113.camel@twins>
On 05.08.2008 [10:56:25 +0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 12:46 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > Bisection on an x455 (2-node IA64) showed that commit
> > 27ec4407790d075c325e1f4da0a19c56953cce23 (sched: make cpu_clock()
> > globally synchronous) broke booting. I see the uncompressing initramfs
> > message and then nothing on the console. I wait about 5 minutes (which
> > is way longer than it takes for the first console messages to get
> > printed normally). The commit immediately before it works fine.
> >
> > The commit no longer cleanly reverts, but I tried to manually put things
> > back to the way they were before in cpu_clock(). The resulting kernel
> > boots fine. I could figure out a clean way to leave cpu_clock() in
> > sched_clock.c because of all the rq dependencies from sched.c. The
> > attempt I tested is below [1]. This patch is *NOT* for inclusion, just
> > to demonstrate what I tested.
> >
> > I'm happy to test any better patches.
>
> Does this work for you?
>
> ---
> Subject: sched_clock: delay using sched_clock()
>
> Some arch's can't handle sched_clock() being called too early - delay
> this until sched_clock_init() has been called.
>
> Reported-by: Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Yep, this fixes things on the box, as well.
Tested-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Thanks,
Nish
--
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-05 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-04 19:46 [BISECTION RESULT] sched: revert cpu_clock to pre-27ec4407790d075c325e1f4da0a19c56953cce23 state Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-04 20:37 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-04 22:00 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-04 22:02 ` David Miller
2008-08-04 22:10 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-04 22:14 ` David Miller
2008-08-04 22:22 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-04 22:41 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-04 22:45 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-04 22:53 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-04 23:30 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-05 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-05 14:59 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-05 17:34 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2008-08-13 0:37 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-13 16:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-13 19:29 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-13 20:11 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-19 22:19 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-08-19 22:34 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080805173447.GD7812@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=bgat@billgatliff.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox