From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@citrix.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: Spinlock recursion in hvc_poll
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 22:53:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808052253.10285.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48989727.8090804@goop.org>
Am Dienstag, 5. August 2008 schrieb Jeremy Fitzhardinge:
> Alex Nixon wrote:
> >>> Well I say fixed - it just means I can proceed to a spinlock recursion
> >>> BUG() 2 secs into the boot process, but it should be easier to track
down
> >>> with printks and a coherent stack dump at my disposal.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> What's the backtrace on this?
> >>
> >
> > I just turned DEBUG_SPINLOCKS back on to try catch this bug again, and it
> > seems to occur (very roughly) 1/10 of the time, with nothing changing
between
> > runs.
Ok, this is a guess, I dont fully understand the backtrace.
request_irq tries to call the handler if the IRQ is shared. The irq handler
calls hvc_poll and hvc_kill which might take the same spinlock.
Can you test it this patch fixes the problem?
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
drivers/char/hvc_console.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
@@ -322,10 +322,11 @@ static int hvc_open(struct tty_struct *t
hp->tty = tty;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
+
if (hp->ops->notifier_add)
rc = hp->ops->notifier_add(hp, hp->data);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-05 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <48973E59.1000904@citrix.com>
[not found] ` <489742CF.2030305@goop.org>
[not found] ` <4898096F.4030607@citrix.com>
[not found] ` <48987526.40500@goop.org>
[not found] ` <48987DD8.8080009@citrix.com>
2008-08-05 18:08 ` Spinlock recursion in hvc_poll Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-05 20:53 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2008-08-06 9:12 ` Alex Nixon
2008-08-07 7:18 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-08-08 6:50 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808052253.10285.borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.nixon@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox