From: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
Subject: [patch 5/5] [PATCH 5/5] x86: Run AMD microcode updates via workqueue.
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:21:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080806152320.298570641@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080806152117.198754464@amd.com
[-- Attachment #1: 0005-x86-Run-AMD-microcode-updates-via-workqueue.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5430 bytes --]
Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
index 33b2a21..37d26ec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
* License version 2. See file COPYING for details.
*/
+/* #define DEBUG */ /* pr_debug */
#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
@@ -40,7 +41,7 @@
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("AMD Microcode Update Driver");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>");
-MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
#define UCODE_MAGIC 0x00414d44
#define UCODE_EQUIV_CPU_TABLE_TYPE 0x00000000
@@ -65,11 +66,16 @@ extern struct mutex (microcode_mutex);
struct equiv_cpu_entry *equiv_cpu_table;
extern struct ucode_cpu_info ucode_cpu_info[NR_CPUS];
+extern struct ucode_work_info ucode_work_info[NR_CPUS];
-static void collect_cpu_info_amd(int cpu)
+static inline struct ucode_cpu_info *get_ucode_cpu_info(int cpu)
+{
+ return &ucode_work_info[cpu].uci;
+}
+
+static void collect_cpu_info_amd(int cpu, struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
- struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
/* We should bind the task to the CPU */
BUG_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu);
@@ -95,7 +101,7 @@ static void collect_cpu_info_amd(int cpu)
static int get_matching_microcode_amd(void *mc, int cpu)
{
- struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
+ struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = get_ucode_cpu_info(cpu);
struct microcode_header_amd *mc_header = mc;
unsigned long total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header);
void *new_mc;
@@ -215,7 +221,7 @@ static void apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
unsigned int eax, edx;
unsigned int rev;
int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
- struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu_num;
+ struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = get_ucode_cpu_info(cpu_num);
/* We should bind the task to the CPU */
BUG_ON(cpu_num != cpu);
@@ -437,61 +443,83 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode_amd(int cpu)
return error;
}
-static int apply_microcode_check_cpu_amd(int cpu)
+static void microcode_fini_cpu_amd(int cpu)
{
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
- struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
- unsigned int rev;
- cpumask_t old;
- int err = 0;
+ struct ucode_work_info *wi = ucode_work_info + cpu;
- /* Check if the microcode is available */
- if (!uci->mc.mc_amd)
- return 0;
+ mutex_lock(µcode_mutex);
+ wi->uci.valid = 0;
+ vfree(wi->uci.mc.mc_amd);
+ wi->uci.mc.mc_amd = NULL;
+ wi->resume = 0;
+ mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex);
+}
+
+static int microcode_resume_cpu(int cpu, struct ucode_cpu_info *new_uci)
+{
+ struct ucode_work_info *wi = ucode_work_info + cpu;
+ struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &wi->uci;
- old = current->cpus_allowed;
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, &cpumask_of_cpu(cpu));
+ if (!wi->resume)
+ return 0;
- /* Check if the microcode we have in memory matches the CPU */
- if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD || c->x86 < 16)
- err = -EINVAL;
+ pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d resumed (ucode: %p)\n",
+ cpu, uci->mc.mc_amd);
- if (!err) {
- asm volatile("movl %1, %%ecx; rdmsr"
- : "=a" (rev)
- : "i" (0x0000008B) : "ecx");
+ wi->resume = 0;
- if (uci->rev != rev)
- err = -EINVAL;
- }
+ /* check if the 'cached' microcode is ok: */
+ if (!uci->mc.mc_amd)
+ return 1;
- if (!err)
+ if (new_uci->sig == uci->sig &&
+ new_uci->pf == uci->pf &&
+ new_uci->rev == uci->rev) {
apply_microcode_amd(cpu);
- else
- printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: Could not apply microcode to CPU%d:"
- " rev=0x%x\n",
- cpu, uci->rev);
+ } else {
+ microcode_fini_cpu_amd(cpu);
+ *uci = *new_uci;
+ }
- set_cpus_allowed(current, old);
- return err;
+ return 1;
}
-static void microcode_fini_cpu_amd(int cpu)
+static void microcode_update_cpu_amd(struct work_struct *w)
{
- struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
+ struct ucode_work_info *wi = container_of(w, struct ucode_work_info,
+ work);
+ int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); /* keventd is per-cpu */
+ struct ucode_cpu_info new_uci;
+
+ pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d workqueue\n", cpu);
+
+ memset(&new_uci, 0, sizeof(new_uci));
mutex_lock(µcode_mutex);
- uci->valid = 0;
- vfree(uci->mc.mc_amd);
- uci->mc.mc_amd = NULL;
+
+ collect_cpu_info_amd(cpu, &new_uci);
+
+ if (new_uci.valid) {
+ /*
+ * Check if the system resume is in progress,
+ * otherwise just request a firmware:
+ */
+ if (!microcode_resume_cpu(cpu, &new_uci)) {
+ wi->uci = new_uci;
+
+ if (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING)
+ cpu_request_microcode_amd(cpu);
+ }
+ }
+
mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex);
}
static struct microcode_ops microcode_amd_ops = {
.get_next_ucode = get_next_ucode_amd,
+ .microcode_update_cpu = microcode_update_cpu_amd,
.get_matching_microcode = get_matching_microcode_amd,
.microcode_sanity_check = NULL,
- .apply_microcode_check_cpu = apply_microcode_check_cpu_amd,
.cpu_request_microcode = cpu_request_microcode_amd,
.collect_cpu_info = collect_cpu_info_amd,
.apply_microcode = apply_microcode_amd,
--
1.5.4.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-06 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-06 15:21 [patch 0/5] x86-microcode: run ucode update via workqueue Peter Oruba
2008-08-06 15:21 ` [patch 1/5] [PATCH 1/5] x86: microcode generic updates Peter Oruba
2008-08-11 19:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-06 15:21 ` [patch 2/5] [PATCH 2/5] x86: Minor correction to header file Peter Oruba
2008-08-11 19:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-06 15:21 ` [patch 3/5] [PATCH 3/5] x86: Run Intel ucode-updates via workqueue Peter Oruba
2008-08-06 15:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-06 15:56 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-06 15:57 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-06 20:31 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-06 20:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-11 19:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-06 15:21 ` [patch 4/5] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Minor correction to Intel microcode patch loader Peter Oruba
2008-08-11 19:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-12 14:14 ` Peter Oruba
2008-08-06 15:21 ` Peter Oruba [this message]
2008-08-06 20:14 ` [patch 0/5] x86-microcode: run ucode update via workqueue Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-06 20:35 ` Max Krasnyansky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080806152320.298570641@amd.com \
--to=peter.oruba@amd.com \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox