From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] x86: avoid highmem cache attribute aliasing
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:09:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080811190908.GM13158@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080811171019.GK4524@elte.hu>
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:10:19AM -0700, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > Highmem code can leave ptes and tlb entries around for a given page
> > even after kunmap, and after it has been freed.
> >
> > From what I can gather, the PAT code may change the cache attributes
> > of arbitrary physical addresses (ie. including highmem pages), which
> > would result in aliases in the case that it operates on one of these
> > lazy tlb highmem pages.
> >
> > Flushing kmaps should solve the problem.
> >
> > I've also just added code for conditional flushing if we haven't got
> > any dangling highmem aliases -- this should help performance if we
> > change page attributes frequently or systems that aren't using much
> > highmem pages (eg. if < 4G RAM). Should be turned into 2 patches, but
> > just for RFC...
>
> hm, such aliasing might happen in theory - and i guess in practice too
> if the AGP driver allocates/deallocates aperture in short succession.
>
> Maybe this could corrupt the X framebuffer - or even generic kernel RAM.
> Mind resending the two split up patches? The fix we might want to take
> into v2.6.27, the speedup probably for v2.6.28.
>
> But maybe i'm missing something obvious that prevents such problems on
> 32-bit systems - Venki, Suresh, what do you think?
Andi pointed out in another thread that we don't use GFP_HIGHMEM in the
AGP drivers. And hence we haven't encountered an issue so far. But yes,
this is a good fix to close the hole.
thanks,
suresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-11 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-01 1:15 [rfc][patch] x86: avoid highmem cache attribute aliasing Nick Piggin
2008-08-11 17:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 19:09 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2008-08-15 15:22 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080811190908.GM13158@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox