From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>,
Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/5] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Minor correction to Intel microcode patch loader.
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:27:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080811192713.GG12788@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080806152320.081968686@amd.com>
* Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
> index 4ab6ce3..8d69470 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static void apply_microcode(int cpu)
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned int val[2];
> int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
> - struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = get_ucode_cpu_info(cpu);
> + struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = get_ucode_cpu_info(cpu_num);
hm, this does not apply to tip/x86/microcode nor tip/master nor
linus/master. Does it fix a bug in one of the earlier patches in this
5/5 queue?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-11 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-06 15:21 [patch 0/5] x86-microcode: run ucode update via workqueue Peter Oruba
2008-08-06 15:21 ` [patch 1/5] [PATCH 1/5] x86: microcode generic updates Peter Oruba
2008-08-11 19:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-06 15:21 ` [patch 2/5] [PATCH 2/5] x86: Minor correction to header file Peter Oruba
2008-08-11 19:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-06 15:21 ` [patch 3/5] [PATCH 3/5] x86: Run Intel ucode-updates via workqueue Peter Oruba
2008-08-06 15:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-06 15:56 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-06 15:57 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-06 20:31 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-08-06 20:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-11 19:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-06 15:21 ` [patch 4/5] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Minor correction to Intel microcode patch loader Peter Oruba
2008-08-11 19:27 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-08-12 14:14 ` Peter Oruba
2008-08-06 15:21 ` [patch 5/5] [PATCH 5/5] x86: Run AMD microcode updates via workqueue Peter Oruba
2008-08-06 20:14 ` [patch 0/5] x86-microcode: run ucode update " Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-06 20:35 ` Max Krasnyansky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080811192713.GG12788@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=peter.oruba@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox