Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem with fpu state changes

H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-10T05:48:46Z

Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 10:52:48AM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>>> Actually I was mistaken, Intel has done the right thing by not
>>> generating a fault on crc32c with TS set.
>> Yes, the documentation seems to says so. But I am double checking
>> with experts inside, to make sure we got the SDM right.
>
> Thanks for checking this!

Indeed :)

-hpa