From: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: resume from s2ram regression (bisected to ftrace...)
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:37:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080812163724.GA5395@joi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48A08475.1090805@redhat.com>
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 02:27:01PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Sunday, 10 of August 2008, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 07:40:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sunday, 10 of August 2008, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Few days ago I discovered that resume from suspend to ram does not work
>>>>> anymore
>>>>> on my 2.6.27-rc2 (actually 796aadeb1b2db9b5d463946766c5bbfd7717158c)
>>>>> gentoo box.
>>>>> My computer just boots on resume. Today I had enough time to bisect it
>>>>> and found
>>>>> (after 1 panic and 1 build breakage) out "the reason":
>>>>>
>>>>> $ git bisect good
>>>>> d05cdb25d80f06f77aa6bddb53cd1390d4d91a0b is first bad commit
>>>>> commit d05cdb25d80f06f77aa6bddb53cd1390d4d91a0b
>>>>> Author: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>>>>> Date: Mon May 12 21:20:54 2008 +0200
>>>>>
>>>>> ftrace: fix dynamic ftrace selftest
>>>>>
>>>> Does it still happen if:
>>>> - CONFIG_FTRACE is unset
>>>>
>>> no
>>>
>>>
>>>> - CONFIG_FTRACE is set, but CONFIG_FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST is unset?
>>>>
>>> yes
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for testing.
>>
>> Well, ftrace is a new feature in 2.6.27, IIRC, so this is not a regression
>> in
>> the strict sense.
>>
>> Still, of couse, there is a bug in ftrace that needs to be fixed. Steven?
>>
> Sorry for the late response.
>
> Red Hat changed its mail servers, and my mail was in limbo for a while.
>
> I'm not doubting that FTRACE enabled breaks suspend to ram, but I find it
> highly unlikely that the commit you posted was the culprit. Especially
> since it still breaks when STARTUP_TEST is disabled. That change was a
> STARTUP_TEST change only. Perhaps it just moved things around enough to
> cause your issues.
>
> But you say that if you take Linus's latest git tree, and revert only this
> change, it works??
Yes.
> Hmm, this is very strange.
I agree. Any idea how to debug it?
Marcin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-12 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-10 17:08 resume from s2ram regression (bisected to ftrace...) Marcin Slusarz
2008-08-10 17:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-08-10 19:24 ` Marcin Slusarz
2008-08-10 19:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-08-11 18:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-12 16:37 ` Marcin Slusarz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080812163724.GA5395@joi \
--to=marcin.slusarz@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox