From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755526AbYHMDux (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:50:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752086AbYHMDup (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:50:45 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:46162 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753992AbYHMDuo (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:50:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:49:00 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Huang Ying Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Pavel Machek , nigel@nigel.suspend2.net, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Vivek Goyal , mingo@elte.hu, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kexec Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 1/7] kexec jump: clean up #ifdef and comments Message-Id: <20080812204900.db63deaa.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1218510861.24951.40.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> References: <1218510861.24951.40.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:14:21 +0800 Huang Ying wrote: > xchg(&kexec_lock, 0); kernel/kexec.c: In function 'kernel_kexec': kernel/kexec.c:1501: warning: value computed is not used Is there any reason why we cannot use the more conventional test_and_set_bit() etc, rather than this peculiarity? Or perhaps spin_trylock?