public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matthew@wil.cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Replace inode flush semaphore with a completion
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:50:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080813075057.GZ6119@disturbed> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218597077.6166.15.camel@dhcp32.mvista.com>

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:11:17PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 18:44 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Use the new completion flush code to implement the inode
> > flush lock. Removes one of the final users of semaphores
> > in the XFS code base.
> > 
> > Version 2:
> > o make flock functions static inlines
> > o use new completion interfaces
> 
> I was looking over this lock in XFS .. The iflock/ifunlock seem to be
> very much like mutexes in most of the calling locations.

Semaphores, not mutexes. The unlock most commonly happens in a
different context (i.e. I/O completion).

> Where the lock
> happens at the start, and the unlock happens when the function calls
> bottom out. It seems like a better way to go would be to change from,
> 
> xfs_ilock(uqp, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> xfs_iflock(uqp);
> error = xfs_iflush(uqp, XFS_IFLUSH_SYNC);
> 
> Where xfs_iflush eventually does the unlock to,
> 
> xfs_ilock(uqp, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> xfs_iflock(uqp);
> error = xfs_iflush(uqp, XFS_IFLUSH_SYNC);
> xfs_ifunlock(uqp);

Firstly, sync flushes are rare. Async are common.

Right now we have the case where no matter what type of flush
is done, the caller does not have to worry about unlocking
the flush lock - it will be done as part of the flush. You're
suggestion makes that conditional based on whether we did a
sync flush or not.

So, what happenѕ when you call:

xfs_iflush(ip, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_SYNC);

i.e. xfs_iflush() may do an delayed flush or a sync flush depending
on the current state of the inode. The caller has no idea what type
of flush was done, so will have no idea whether to unlock or not.

> And remove the unlocking from inside xfs_iflush(). Then use a flag to
> indicate that the flush is in progress, and a
> completion/wait_for_completion when another thread needs to wait on the
> flush to complete if it's an async flush.

And if it's a delayed flush? If we just wait for completion, we'll
have to wait for a long time before the xfsbufd times out the buffer
and pushes it to disk. This is important - the log AIL push code
does try-locks on the flush lock to determine if the inode is in a
delayed write state or not, and does an async buffer push inѕtead
of xfs_iflush() to get it to disk immediately.

That is, there are three types of inode flushes (sync, async and
delwri) and the flush lock is used in different ways to determine
what action to take when writing back inodes. There's much more to
this 'flush lock' than just locking ;)

> That seems vastly more complex than your current patch, but I think it
> will be much cleaner ..

Doesn't seem that way to me...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-13  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-27  8:44 [PATCH 0/6] Remove most users of semaphores from XFS V2 Dave Chinner
2008-06-27  8:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] Clean up stale references to semaphores Dave Chinner
2008-06-27  8:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] Replace the XFS buf iodone semaphore with a completion Dave Chinner
2008-06-27  8:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush requirements Dave Chinner
2008-06-27  8:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] Replace inode flush semaphore with a completion Dave Chinner
2008-08-13  3:11   ` Daniel Walker
2008-08-13  7:50     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2008-08-13 15:34       ` Daniel Walker
2008-08-14  0:19         ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-14  1:34           ` Daniel Walker
2008-08-14  2:30             ` Dave Chinner
2008-06-27  8:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] Replace dquot " Dave Chinner
2008-06-27  8:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] Remove the sema_t from XFS Dave Chinner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-11  1:13 [RESEND, PATCH 0/6] Remove most users of semaphores " Dave Chinner
2008-07-11  1:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] Replace inode flush semaphore with a completion Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080813075057.GZ6119@disturbed \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox