public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: invalidate caches before going into suspend
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:30:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808131230.07581.mark.langsdorf@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808131011050.3462@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>

On Wednesday 13 August 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> > 
> > I don't think it's necessary.  I can submit a delta patch later if you
> > think it's really necessary.
> 
> Why not at least move it to after the local_irq_disable()?
> 
> That local_irq_disable() will do tons of writes if you have 
> lockdep enabled, it calls trace_hardirqs_off() etc. Maybe they don't end 
> up ever mattering, but wouldn't it make much more sense to just move the 
> wbinvd down to just before the
> 
> 	while (1)
> 		halt();
> 
> which is also likely to make sure that the compiler won't do anything at 
> all because everything is dead at that point with no function calls etc 
> happening.

I don't think we realized that local_irq_disable() did all that and
so we only tested the submitted patch.  I've resubmitted the unified
patch after applying your suggestion.  Thanks.

-Mark Langsdorf
Operating System Research Center
AMD


  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-13 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-13 16:41 invalidate caches before going into suspend Mark Langsdorf
2008-08-13 16:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-13 16:53   ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-13 17:01     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-13 17:28       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-13 17:35         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-13 17:37           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-13 17:09   ` Mark Langsdorf
2008-08-13 17:17     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-13 17:30       ` Mark Langsdorf [this message]
2008-08-13 17:52         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-13 18:33           ` [PATCH](retry 2) " Mark Langsdorf
2008-08-13 18:42             ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-13 18:47               ` Langsdorf, Mark
2008-08-13 21:32                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-14 13:45                   ` [PATCH](retry 3) " Mark Langsdorf
2008-08-14 13:49                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-14 14:00                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-14 14:11                     ` [PATCH](retry 4) " Mark Langsdorf
2008-08-15 12:04                       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-13 17:38     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-13 19:39 ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200808131230.07581.mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
    --to=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox