From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
nigel@nigel.suspend2.net, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec jump: fix compiling warning on xchg(&kexec_lock, 0) in kernel_kexec()
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:31:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080813183156.GA20974@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1r68shjhb.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:12:48AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Huang Ying wrote:
> >>
> >> - xchg(&kexec_lock, 0);
> >> + locked = xchg(&kexec_lock, 0);
> >> + BUG_ON(!locked);
> >
> > Why do you want to do this at all?
> >
> > And why do you implement your locks with xchg() in the first place? That's
> > total and utter crap.
> >
> > Hint: we have _real_ locking primitives in the kernel.
>
> This part certainly.
>
> The way the code should work, and the way it has in the past is:
> image = xchg(&kexec_image, NULL)
> if (!image)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> Very simple and very obvious and very easy to get right, and it has
> been that way for years.
>
Hi Eric,
Are there any issues with usage of test_and_set_bit() or usage of spinlock
primitives?
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-13 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-13 9:12 [PATCH] kexec jump: fix compiling warning on xchg(&kexec_lock, 0) in kernel_kexec() Huang Ying
2008-08-13 9:27 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-13 17:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-13 17:25 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-13 17:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-13 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-13 18:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-13 18:31 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2008-08-13 19:44 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-13 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-13 20:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-13 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-13 20:25 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-13 20:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-13 20:41 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-13 21:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-08-13 22:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-13 20:15 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080813183156.GA20974@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox