From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
jbaron@redhat.com, randy.dunlap@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joe@perches.com,
nick@nick-andrew.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dynamic debug v2 - infrastructure
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:54:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080813235425.GD32154@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080813200047.GA2053@uranus.ravnborg.org>
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:00:47PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:38:59PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 06:16:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:08:04 -0700
> > > Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 04:46:19PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 01:09:08PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > > So close, can I have a good changelog comment with the patch so people
> > > > > > know what it is when they look in the logs?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Care to resend it with that?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Base infrastructure to enable per-module debug messages.
> > > >
> > > > Ah, so close...
> > > >
> > > > With this patch, I get the following build error:
> > > >
> > > > CC [M] drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.o
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c: In function ___gether_setup___:
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: ___KBUILD_MODNAME___ undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: for each function it appears in.)
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: unknown field ___Usage___ specified in initializer
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: expected expression before ___.___ token
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: initializer element is not constant
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: (near initialization for ___descriptor.hash___)
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: ___Usage___ undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: invalid operands to binary << (have ___long long int___ and ___char *___)
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: expected ___)___ before ___:___ token
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: invalid operands to binary & (have ___long long int___ and ___char *___)
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: invalid operands to binary << (have ___long long int___ and ___char *___)
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: expected ___)___ before ___:___ token
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: invalid operands to binary & (have ___long long int___ and ___char *___)
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: expected ___)___ before ___:___ token
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: warning: passing argument 4 of _____dynamic_dbg_enabled_helper___ makes integer from pointer without a cast
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: expected ___)___ before ___KBUILD_MODNAME___
> > >
> > > (lol at gcc crap)
> > >
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: warning: too few arguments for format
> > >
> > > argh, not that again. We had this with a patch from Jesse a while
> > > back, which I fixed thusly:
> >
> > <patch moving KBUILD_MODNAME from a inline function to a macro snipped>
> >
> > Yeah, I remember that too, but in this case, KBUILD_MODNAME is being
> > used in a macro, not an inline function, the exact opposite.
> >
> > Sam, any ideas here? I'll bounce the original patch at you if you
> > missed it last time.
>
> I have not looked into the particular error but what happens is
> that u_ether.o is used by more than one module so kbuild does
> not know what value to assign the KBUILD_MODNAME and therefore
> decide not to assign KBUILD_MODNAME at all.
Ick.
Hm, how do I fix this? Build u_ether.c into two different .o files,
depending on which module it is being included into?
Or do:
#include "u_ether.c"
in the source code that was linking it in?
Actually, as ugly as that last one is, it probably would solve this
issue, and be the same end-result, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-13 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-15 21:31 [PATCH 1/7] dynamic debug v2 - infrastructure Jason Baron
2008-07-17 7:01 ` Greg KH
2008-07-17 21:20 ` Jason Baron
2008-07-17 22:32 ` Greg KH
2008-07-17 22:56 ` Dominik Brodowski
2008-07-17 23:35 ` Greg KH
2008-07-18 6:37 ` Dominik Brodowski
2008-07-18 14:39 ` Jason Baron
2008-08-08 21:51 ` Jason Baron
2008-08-09 1:07 ` Greg KH
2008-08-11 14:12 ` Jason Baron
2008-08-11 16:45 ` Greg KH
2008-08-09 2:38 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-08-11 17:36 ` Jason Baron
2008-08-11 22:33 ` Greg KH
2008-08-12 19:48 ` Jason Baron
2008-08-12 20:09 ` Greg KH
2008-08-12 20:46 ` Jason Baron
2008-08-13 1:08 ` Greg KH
2008-08-13 1:16 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-13 3:38 ` Greg KH
2008-08-13 20:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-08-13 22:49 ` jbaron
2008-08-13 23:54 ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-08-14 1:25 ` Greg KH
2008-08-13 19:05 ` Jason Baron
2008-08-14 14:53 ` Greg KH
2008-08-14 21:05 ` Jason Baron
2008-09-16 0:03 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080813235425.GD32154@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nick@nick-andrew.net \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox