From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758696AbYHNJRt (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:17:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755653AbYHNJRl (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:17:41 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:46500 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752315AbYHNJRk (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:17:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:17:03 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Trevor Woollacott [ MTN - Innovation Centre ]" Cc: Subject: Re: POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED Message-Id: <20080814021703.355b2a76.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <70D00C33FCD1FD4A860DEAC228277C0C048425D1@MTNMAIL1.mtn.co.za> References: <70D00C33FCD1FD4A860DEAC228277C0C048425D1@MTNMAIL1.mtn.co.za> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:05:39 +0200 "Trevor Woollacott [ MTN - Innovation Centre ]" wrote: > > Hi all > > Does anyone know if posix_fadvise() with POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED is > blocking/unblocking? It tries to be nonblocking and will mostly succeed in that. It might occasionally block on a metadata read or journal congestion or something, so it isn't guaranteed.