public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Kenneth Goldman <kgoldman@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:12:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080814111210.GI6995@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF6C940C00.249617D7-ON852574A3.0071F8B0-852574A3.00732160@us.ibm.com>

Hi!

> > And what happens when the chip simply goes away due to a hotplug action?
> > Or not even the actual chip goes away but just the chip driver and you
> > now dereference freed memory?
> 
> Being a TCG/TPM person, I can only address the first question.  The
> intent is that the TPM is soldered to the planar/motherboard (the TCG
> uses the phrase "bound to the platform").  I can't imagine
> any manufacturer designing a pluggable TPM.  It would subvert PCR

Only 2 TPMs I've seen were on pluggable modules... which was fortunate
because they slowed down boot by 5+ minutes, and broke it completely
in other cases. Nickname 'kurvitko' (aka useless trash that breaks
stuff). They are currently lying under my table, disconnected.

(OTOH they were not on PCI, but on some low-count pin header).
							Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-08-15  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20080808184349.999902616@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2008-08-08 18:55 ` [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface Mimi Zohar
2008-08-09 18:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-11 21:13     ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-12 19:30       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-12 20:57         ` Kenneth Goldman
2008-08-12 21:36           ` Alan Cox
2008-08-13 13:46             ` Kenneth Goldman
2008-08-13 13:40               ` Alan Cox
2008-08-13 14:45                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-13 16:39                 ` Kenneth Goldman
2008-08-12 23:16           ` Greg KH
2008-08-13 13:58             ` Kenneth Goldman
2008-08-13 16:56             ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-14 11:12           ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-08-15 10:37             ` Peter Dolding
2008-08-15 18:50               ` Kenneth Goldman
2008-08-15 19:22                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-08-15 21:17                 ` Alan Cox
2008-08-18 15:01             ` Kenneth Goldman
2008-08-08 18:55 ` [PATCH 2/4] integrity: special fs magic Mimi Zohar
2008-08-08 19:04   ` Greg KH
2008-08-08 19:15     ` Greg KH
2008-08-08 19:50       ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-08 23:07         ` Greg KH
2008-08-09 18:47       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-10 13:48         ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-08 19:36     ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-08 23:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-08 18:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] integrity: Linux Integrity Module(LIM) Mimi Zohar
2008-08-09 18:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-10 13:52     ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-11 17:02       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-08-11 19:08         ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-11 19:56           ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-08-12  8:41             ` Peter Dolding
2008-08-12 19:29               ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-13 10:44                 ` Peter Dolding
2008-08-13 14:11                   ` David Howells
2008-08-13 22:57                     ` Peter Dolding
2008-08-13 17:03             ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-12 19:27         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-12 21:19           ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-08-13 17:03             ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-12 19:25       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-08 18:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] integrity: IMA as an integrity service provider Mimi Zohar
2008-08-08 20:06   ` Randy Dunlap
2008-10-07 18:00 [PATCH 0/4] integrity Mimi Zohar
2008-10-07 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface Mimi Zohar
2008-10-08  5:00   ` James Morris
2008-10-08 13:33     ` Rajiv Andrade
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-13  3:47 [PATCH 0/4] integrity Mimi Zohar
2008-11-13  3:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface Mimi Zohar
2008-11-20 16:43 [PATCH 0/4] integrity Mimi Zohar
2008-11-20 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080814111210.GI6995@ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kgoldman@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox