From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao" <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: "Jens Axboe" <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"吉川 拓哉" <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>,
dpshah@google.com
Subject: Re: request->ioprio
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:16:33 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808141216.33688.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218611163.8001.108.camel@sebastian.kern.oss.ntt.co.jp>
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 17:06:03 Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> Besides, I guess that accessing the io context information (such as
> ioprio) of a request through elevator-specific private structures is not
> something we want virtio_blk (or future users) to do.
The only semantic I assumed was "higher is better". The server (ie. host) can
really only use the information to schedule between I/Os for that particular
guest anyway.
But it sounds like I should be passing "0" in there unconditionally until the
kernel semantics are sorted out and I can do something more intelligent? I
haven't checked, but I assume that's actually what's happening at the moment
(the field is zero)?
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-14 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1218014196.4419.44.camel@sebastian.kern.oss.ntt.co.jp>
2008-08-06 20:33 ` request->ioprio Rusty Russell
2008-08-13 7:06 ` request->ioprio Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-13 8:14 ` [PATCH] virtio_blk: use a wrapper function to access io context information of IO requests Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-14 4:42 ` Rusty Russell
2008-08-14 5:17 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-14 5:22 ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-14 7:58 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-14 2:16 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2008-08-14 4:26 ` request->ioprio Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-15 5:51 ` request->ioprio Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-16 7:13 ` request->ioprio Rusty Russell
2008-08-06 9:32 request->ioprio Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-06 17:22 ` request->ioprio Divyesh Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808141216.33688.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox