Re: [PATCH 00/07] dyn_array/nr_irqs/sparse_irq support v10 - fix

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

btw., one new thing i got in testing due to irq/sparseirq is this new 
lockdep splat:

[    0.000000] Initializing CPU#0
[    0.000000] found new irq_desc for irq 0
[    0.000000] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
[    0.000000] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
[    0.000000] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[    0.000000] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27-rc3-tip-00191-g98ccb89-dirty #1
[    0.000000]  [<c0153c22>] register_lock_class+0x3d2/0x400
[    0.000000]  [<c0104d87>] ? mcount_call+0x5/0xa
[    0.000000]  [<c0154f3a>] __lock_acquire+0x22a/0x5d0
[    0.000000]  [<c0104d87>] ? mcount_call+0x5/0xa
[    0.000000]  [<c0155351>] lock_acquire+0x71/0xa0
[    0.000000]  [<c016d61f>] ? set_irq_chip+0x3f/0x90
[    0.000000]  [<c070f148>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x58/0x90
[    0.000000]  [<c016d61f>] ? set_irq_chip+0x3f/0x90
[    0.000000]  [<c016d61f>] set_irq_chip+0x3f/0x90
[    0.000000]  [<c016d7e0>] ? handle_level_irq+0x0/0xe0
[    0.000000]  [<c016da1a>] set_irq_chip_and_handler_name+0x1a/0x40
[    0.000000]  [<c0a396c1>] init_ISA_irqs+0x51/0xa0
[    0.000000]  [<c0a4a365>] pre_intr_init_hook+0x25/0x30
[    0.000000]  [<c0a39723>] native_init_IRQ+0x13/0x370
[    0.000000]  [<c015569c>] ? lock_release+0xcc/0x1d0
[    0.000000]  [<c0104d87>] ? mcount_call+0x5/0xa
[    0.000000]  [<c070dc22>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x92/0x110
[    0.000000]  [<c070dcad>] ? mutex_unlock+0xd/0x10
[    0.000000]  [<c0135f62>] ? cpu_maps_update_done+0x12/0x20
[    0.000000]  [<c06c6743>] ? register_cpu_notifier+0x23/0x30
[    0.000000]  [<c011e8ae>] init_IRQ+0xe/0x10
[    0.000000]  [<c0a357a5>] start_kernel+0x1c5/0x340
[    0.000000]  [<c0a35280>] ? unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x210
[    0.000000]  [<c0a3506b>] i386_start_kernel+0x6b/0x80
[    0.000000]  =======================
[    0.000000] found new irq_desc for irq 1
[    0.000000] found new irq_desc for irq 2
[    0.000000] found new irq_desc for irq 3

this:

 static void init_one_irq_desc(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
         memcpy(desc, &irq_desc_init, sizeof(struct irq_desc));
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
         lockdep_set_class(&desc->lock, &irq_desc_lock_class);
 #endif
 }

looks wrong - it should be unconditional (i've done that via the patch 
below). I dont remember why we made early_init_irq_lock_class() 
dependent on CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS before. Peter, do you have any 
memories?

	Ingo

--------------------------->
>From bba3b43f2383c2fd06c4befee45ef30d5cf59d32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:34:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sparseirq: fix lockdep

-tip testing found this lockdep splat:

[    0.000000] Initializing CPU#0
[    0.000000] found new irq_desc for irq 0
[    0.000000] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
[    0.000000] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
[    0.000000] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[    0.000000] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27-rc3-tip-00191-g98ccb89-dirty #1
[    0.000000]  [<c0153c22>] register_lock_class+0x3d2/0x400
[    0.000000]  [<c0104d87>] ? mcount_call+0x5/0xa
[    0.000000]  [<c0154f3a>] __lock_acquire+0x22a/0x5d0
[    0.000000]  [<c0104d87>] ? mcount_call+0x5/0xa
[    0.000000]  [<c0155351>] lock_acquire+0x71/0xa0
[    0.000000]  [<c016d61f>] ? set_irq_chip+0x3f/0x90
[    0.000000]  [<c070f148>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x58/0x90
[    0.000000]  [<c016d61f>] ? set_irq_chip+0x3f/0x90
[    0.000000]  [<c016d61f>] set_irq_chip+0x3f/0x90
[    0.000000]  [<c016d7e0>] ? handle_level_irq+0x0/0xe0
[    0.000000]  [<c016da1a>] set_irq_chip_and_handler_name+0x1a/0x40
[    0.000000]  [<c0a396c1>] init_ISA_irqs+0x51/0xa0
[    0.000000]  [<c0a4a365>] pre_intr_init_hook+0x25/0x30
[    0.000000]  [<c0a39723>] native_init_IRQ+0x13/0x370
[    0.000000]  [<c015569c>] ? lock_release+0xcc/0x1d0
[    0.000000]  [<c0104d87>] ? mcount_call+0x5/0xa
[    0.000000]  [<c070dc22>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x92/0x110
[    0.000000]  [<c070dcad>] ? mutex_unlock+0xd/0x10
[    0.000000]  [<c0135f62>] ? cpu_maps_update_done+0x12/0x20
[    0.000000]  [<c06c6743>] ? register_cpu_notifier+0x23/0x30
[    0.000000]  [<c011e8ae>] init_IRQ+0xe/0x10
[    0.000000]  [<c0a357a5>] start_kernel+0x1c5/0x340
[    0.000000]  [<c0a35280>] ? unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x210
[    0.000000]  [<c0a3506b>] i386_start_kernel+0x6b/0x80
[    0.000000]  =======================
[    0.000000] found new irq_desc for irq 1
[    0.000000] found new irq_desc for irq 2
[    0.000000] found new irq_desc for irq 3

this:

 static void init_one_irq_desc(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
         memcpy(desc, &irq_desc_init, sizeof(struct irq_desc));
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
         lockdep_set_class(&desc->lock, &irq_desc_lock_class);
 #endif
 }

should be unconditional.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/irq/handle.c |    2 --
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
index ce8774b..8cd0c68 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -75,9 +75,7 @@ static struct irq_desc irq_desc_init = {
 static void init_one_irq_desc(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
 	memcpy(desc, &irq_desc_init, sizeof(struct irq_desc));
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 	lockdep_set_class(&desc->lock, &irq_desc_lock_class);
-#endif
 }
 
 extern int after_bootmem;