Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi: temp_stack is used only when CONFIG_SMP is set

[Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 10:12:46AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:24: warning: 'temp_stack' defined but not used
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
> > > > Cc: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
> > > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c |    2 +-
> > > >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c
> > > > index fa2161d..9103cb6 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c
> > > > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ unsigned long acpi_realmode_flags;
> > > >  /* address in low memory of the wakeup routine. */
> > > >  static unsigned long acpi_realmode;
> > > >  
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > > >  static char temp_stack[10240];
> > > >  #endif
> > > >  
> > > 
> > > Now it still generates the warning, but on i386 with CONFIG_SMP set, 
> > > instead of x86_64 without CONFIG_SMP. We only need temp_stack, when both 
> > > CONFIG_64BIT and CONFIG_SMP are activated.
> > 
> > Yes. Thanks for looking at the patch!
> > 
> > ---
> > From c6e673acf02e8bf04866cadf17c1cb1fa4d852ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86, acpi: temp_stack is used only when CONFIG_64BIT && CONFIG_SMP is set
> > 
> > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:24: warning: 'temp_stack' defined but not used
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
> 
> Ingo, can you merge this one?

Should I resend this patch? Or is there anything wrong with second version?

Marcin