From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86_64 : support atomic ops with 64 bits integer values
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:39:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080816073926.GA19546@Krystal> (raw)
x86_64 add/sub atomic ops does not seems to accept integer values bigger
than 32 bits as immediates. Intel's add/sub documentation specifies they
have to be passed as registers.
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.0/gcc/Machine-Constraints.html#Machine-Constraints
states :
e
32-bit signed integer constant, or a symbolic reference known to fit that range (for immediate operands in sign-extending x86-64 instructions).
Z
32-bit unsigned integer constant, or a symbolic reference known to fit that range (for immediate operands in zero-extending x86-64 instructions).
Since add/sub does sign extension, using the "e" constraint seems appropriate.
It applies to 2.6.27-rc, 2.6.26, 2.6.25...
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
---
include/asm-x86/atomic_64.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/asm-x86/atomic_64.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/asm-x86/atomic_64.h 2008-08-16 03:19:35.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/asm-x86/atomic_64.h 2008-08-16 03:21:18.000000000 -0400
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static inline void atomic64_add(long i,
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addq %1,%0"
: "=m" (v->counter)
- : "ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+ : "er" (i), "m" (v->counter));
}
/**
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static inline void atomic64_sub(long i,
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "subq %1,%0"
: "=m" (v->counter)
- : "ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+ : "er" (i), "m" (v->counter));
}
/**
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static inline int atomic64_sub_and_test(
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "subq %2,%0; sete %1"
: "=m" (v->counter), "=qm" (c)
- : "ir" (i), "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
+ : "er" (i), "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
return c;
}
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static inline int atomic64_add_negative(
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addq %2,%0; sets %1"
: "=m" (v->counter), "=qm" (c)
- : "ir" (i), "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
+ : "er" (i), "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
return c;
}
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next reply other threads:[~2008-08-16 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-16 7:39 Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2008-08-16 15:04 ` [PATCH] x86_64 : support atomic ops with 64 bits integer values H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-16 15:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-16 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-16 21:19 ` [RFC PATCH] Fair rwlock Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-16 21:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-17 7:53 ` [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v3 Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-17 16:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-17 19:10 ` [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5 Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-17 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5 (updated benchmarks) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-18 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5 Linus Torvalds
2008-08-18 23:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-19 6:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-19 7:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-19 9:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-19 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 20:50 ` [RFC PATCH] Writer-biased low-latency rwlock v8 Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-21 21:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 21:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-23 5:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-23 18:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-23 20:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-08-23 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-21 21:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-21 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-25 19:20 ` [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5 Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080816073926.GA19546@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox