From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug 11219] KVM modules break emergency reboot
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:03:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080818140355.GA30511@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48A97B9A.1040800@qumranet.com>
* Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> wrote:
> (copying mingo)
>
> (context: sysrq-B with kvm-intel.ko loaded doesn't work. on my machine,
> it kills the sata interface, but the processor and network keeps working)
>
> Strangely, the specs say:
>
>> • The INIT signal is blocked whenever a logical processor is in VMX
>> root operation.
>> It is not blocked in VMX non-root operation. Instead, INITs cause VM
>> exits (see
>> Section 21.3, “Other Causes of VM Exits”).
>
> So INIT (which is wired to the triple-fault processor output, it seems,
> rather than RESET) is blocked and the machine is not reset completely.
>
> So we need to disable vmx during native_machine_emergency_restart().
> There are at least three ways of doing this:
>
> - add a vmxoff sequence (with an exception handler) to
> native_machine_emergency_restart(). while simplest, this will not
> unblock INIT for other cpus
>
> - add an emergency_restart notifier_block, and have kvm subscribe. This
> has the disadvantage of being slightly complex, opening a tiny race
> (emergency restart during kvm module initialization), and requiring IPIs
> during emergency restart.
>
> - move vmxon/vmxoff management out of the kvm module and into x86 core.
> Bloats the core but reduces complexity. IPIs still required.
>
> I think the notifier block is the way to go. Ingo, let me know what you
> prefer.
notifier should be OK i think - sysrq-b is an emergency mechanism after
all.
btw., "echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger" never worked reliably for me with
KVM also loaded.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-18 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080812091950.61E3911D109@picon.linux-foundation.org>
2008-08-18 13:39 ` [Bug 11219] KVM modules break emergency reboot Avi Kivity
2008-08-18 14:03 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-08-23 18:07 2.6.27-rc4-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-08-23 18:10 ` [Bug #11219] KVM modules break emergency reboot Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-16 19:00 2.6.27-rc3-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-08-16 19:02 ` [Bug #11219] KVM modules break emergency reboot Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-08-09 22:40 2.6.27-rc2-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-08-09 22:43 ` [Bug #11219] KVM modules break emergency reboot Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-08-02 17:59 2.6.27-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-08-02 18:04 ` [Bug #11219] KVM modules break emergency reboot Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080818140355.GA30511@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox