From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: vegard.nossum@gmail.com, pavel@suse.cz, robert.richter@amd.com,
mingo@elte.hu, ak@linux.intel.com, phil.el@wanadoo.fr,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:29:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080818142953.a250c30d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200808182316.00854.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:15:59 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Monday, 18 of August 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > Apparently nmi_suspend() conflicts with oprofile somehow. Also, the offlining
> > > of non-boot CPUs may confuse it. It would be helpful to check if the CPU
> > > hotplug works with oprofile.
> >
> > That is a good suggestion :-)
> >
> > Here is offlining:
> >
> > CPU 1 is now offline
> > lockdep: fixing up alternatives.
> > SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
> > CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain.
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > CPU1 attaching NULL sched-domain.
> > CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
> > domain 0: span 0 level CPU
> > groups: 0
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > [repeat last message indefinitely]
> >
> > Here is onlining:
> >
> > Booting processor 1/1 ip 6000
> > Initializing CPU#1
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 5986.15 BogoMIPS (lpj=29930790)
> > CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 16K
> > CPU: L2 cache: 2048K
> > CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> > Intel machine check architecture supported.
> > Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#1.
> > CPU1: Intel P4/Xeon Extended MCE MSRs (24) available
> > CPU1: Thermal monitoring enabled
> > x86 PAT enabled: cpu 1, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106
> > CPU1: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz stepping 05
> > checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#1]:
> > Measured 120 cycles TSC warp between CPUs, turning off TSC clock.
> > Marking TSC unstable due to check_tsc_sync_source failed
> > APIC error on CPU1: 00(40)
> > Clockevents: could not switch to one-shot mode:<7>APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
> > lapic is not functional.
> > Could not switch to high resolution mode on CPU 0
> > Clockevents: could not switch to one-shot mode: lapic is not functional.
> > Could not switch to high resolution mode on CPU 1
> > APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
> > [sched domains messages
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
> > [repeat last message 9 times]
> >
> > Then follows this pattern indefinitely:
> >
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
> > [repeat last message 9 times]
> >
> > That's basically the same thing as I saw with suspend. So it can be
> > reproduced easily with CPU hotplug.
>
> Well, I don't know who's the right person to ask about the CPU hotplug.
> Andrew, can you help please?
>
The CPU hotplug maintainer is basically "everyone", because many
subsystems need to interact correctly with hotplugging, and many
subsystems can break it.
This one looks like a clocksource/apic/resume problem? Probably the
next port of call would be Thomas, with Robert looking on.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-18 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-18 20:32 oprofile + hibernation = badness Vegard Nossum
2008-08-18 20:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-08-18 21:08 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-18 21:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-08-18 21:29 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-08-19 1:13 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-19 7:12 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-19 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-19 12:12 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-19 12:37 ` Robert Richter
2008-08-19 12:56 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-08-19 13:18 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-19 13:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-01 16:34 ` Robert Richter
2008-09-05 17:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-05 18:59 ` Robert Richter
2008-09-05 20:31 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080818142953.a250c30d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=phil.el@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox