From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754754AbYHSHtr (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 03:49:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753098AbYHSHti (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 03:49:38 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39133 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752800AbYHSHti (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 03:49:38 -0400 From: Oliver Neukum Organization: Novell To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Power management for SCSI Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:50:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Pavel Machek , Alan Stern , James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, "Linux-pm mailing list" , kernel list , teheo@novell.com References: <20080813095055.GA475@elf.ucw.cz> <20080819073839.GA8726@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20080819073839.GA8726@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808190950.40790.oneukum@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag 19 August 2008 09:38:39 schrieb Pavel Machek: > Would it make sense to split the patches into "autosuspend for SCSI > devices" and "autosuspend for SCSI controllers" for easier > review/merge? I guess I'll start with the devices, they seem easier... Runtime PM will have to leave devices alone while error handling is active. Unfortunately error handling is done at controller level. So I am afraid this would be very difficult. Regards Oliver