public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: PATCH] debug: add notifier chain debugging
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:09:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080819210932.9bb348b9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080815152938.4bc9d48c@infradead.org>

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:29:38 -0700 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:

> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] debug: add notifier chain debugging
> 
> during some development we suspected a case where we left something
> in a notifier chain that was from a module that was unloaded already...
> and that sort of thing is rather hard to track down.
> 
> This patch adds a very simple sanity check (which isn't all that
> expensive) to make sure the notifier we're about to call is
> actually from either the kernel itself of from a still-loaded
> module, avoiding a hard-to-chase-down crash.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  kernel/notifier.c |   16 ++++++++++++++++
>  lib/Kconfig.debug |   10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/notifier.c b/kernel/notifier.c
> index 823be11..143fdd7 100644
> --- a/kernel/notifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/notifier.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(reboot_notifier_list);
>  static int notifier_chain_register(struct notifier_block **nl,
>  		struct notifier_block *n)
>  {
> +	if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long)n->notifier_call)) {
> +		WARN(1, "Invalid notifier registered!");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>  	while ((*nl) != NULL) {
>  		if (n->priority > (*nl)->priority)
>  			break;
> @@ -34,6 +38,10 @@ static int notifier_chain_register(struct notifier_block **nl,
>  static int notifier_chain_cond_register(struct notifier_block **nl,
>  		struct notifier_block *n)
>  {
> +	if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long)n->notifier_call)) {
> +		WARN(1, "Invalid notifier registered!");
> +		return 0;
> +	}

Seems strange to add checks to the registration functions.  What could
be that broken?

>  	while ((*nl) != NULL) {
>  		if ((*nl) == n)
>  			return 0;
> @@ -82,6 +90,14 @@ static int __kprobes notifier_call_chain(struct notifier_block **nl,
>  
>  	while (nb && nr_to_call) {
>  		next_nb = rcu_dereference(nb->next);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NOTIFIERS
> +		if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long)nb->notifier_call)) {
> +			WARN(1, "Invalid notifier called!");
> +			nb = next_nb;
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +#endif
>  		ret = nb->notifier_call(nb, val, v);
>  
>  		if (nr_calls)
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 800ac84..f4bb36e 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -536,6 +536,16 @@ config DEBUG_SG
>  
>  	  If unsure, say N.
>  
> +config DEBUG_NOTIFIERS
> +	bool "Debug notifier call chains"
> +	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> +	help
> +	  Enable this to turn on sanity checking for notifier call chains.
> +	  This is most useful for kernel developers to make sure that
> +	  modules properly unregister themselves from notifier chains.
> +	  This is a relatively cheap check but if you care about maximum
> +	  performance, say N.
> +

If we remove the first two checks then surely we can afford to add the
remaining check unconditionally and lose the new config option and its
ifdef.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-08-20  4:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-15 22:29 PATCH] debug: add notifier chain debugging Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-15 22:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-20  4:09 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-08-20 10:53   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-22 14:00   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-22 14:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-25 22:39 ` Tony Luck
2008-08-26  4:55   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-26  5:08     ` Tony Luck
2008-08-26 13:46       ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-26 16:22       ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-27  6:39         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-27 10:55           ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080819210932.9bb348b9.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox