public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq need spin_lock in alloc
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:27:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080821102757.GA19019@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080821085818.GB29541@elte.hu>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > Each of these locks can be made local to the function in which they 
> > are used (and hence they should be made local).
> > 
> > It would be nice to add a comment explaining what they are protecting, 
> > unless that is obvious (I didn't look).
> 
> ok - i moved the locks next to the data structure they protect (the free 
> list head), and added a small exlanation as well - as per the commit 
> below.

they also need to be irqsafe locks, as they might be taken inside 
irq-safe locks. Updated patch below.

	Ingo

>From a532e19680ada3b8579b81e67e76d3ebd19c340f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:46:25 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq needs spin_lock in allocations

Suresh Siddha noticed that we should have a spinlock around it.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c |   13 ++++++++++++-
 kernel/irq/handle.c       |   13 ++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
index 34c74cf..7ca5566 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -146,6 +146,12 @@ static void init_one_irq_cfg(struct irq_cfg *cfg)
 }
 
 static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfgx;
+
+/*
+ * Protect the irq_cfgx_free freelist:
+ */
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_cfg_lock);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
 static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfgx_free;
 #endif
@@ -213,8 +219,9 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned int irq)
 static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 {
 	struct irq_cfg *cfg, *cfg_pri;
-	int i;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int count = 0;
+	int i;
 
 	cfg_pri = cfg = irq_cfgx;
 	while (cfg) {
@@ -226,6 +233,7 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 		count++;
 	}
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_cfg_lock, flags);
 	if (!irq_cfgx_free) {
 		unsigned long phys;
 		unsigned long total_bytes;
@@ -263,6 +271,9 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 	else
 		irq_cfgx = cfg;
 	cfg->irq = irq;
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_cfg_lock, flags);
+
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_cfg for irq %d\n", cfg->irq);
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
 	{
diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
index 24c83a3..d638a91 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -107,6 +107,11 @@ static void init_kstat_irqs(struct irq_desc *desc, int nr_desc, int nr)
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * Protect the sparse_irqs_free freelist:
+ */
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sparse_irq_lock);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
 static struct irq_desc *sparse_irqs_free;
 struct irq_desc *sparse_irqs;
@@ -166,11 +171,13 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc(unsigned int irq)
 	}
 	return NULL;
 }
+
 struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 {
 	struct irq_desc *desc, *desc_pri;
-	int i;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int count = 0;
+	int i;
 
 	desc_pri = desc = sparse_irqs;
 	while (desc) {
@@ -182,6 +189,7 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 		count++;
 	}
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&sparse_irq_lock, flags);
 	/*
 	 *  we run out of pre-allocate ones, allocate more
 	 */
@@ -223,6 +231,9 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 	else
 		sparse_irqs = desc;
 	desc->irq = irq;
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sparse_irq_lock, flags);
+
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_desc for irq %d\n", desc->irq);
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
 	{

      reply	other threads:[~2008-08-21 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-21  3:46 [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq need spin_lock in alloc Yinghai Lu
2008-08-21  4:03 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-21  8:58   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-21 10:27     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080821102757.GA19019@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox