From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: latest -git: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/ipi.c:123 send_IPI_mask_bitmask+0xc3/0xe0()
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:36:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080825203649.GH26610@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080825195029.GA27030@redhat.com>
> On some systems (for which there aren't BIOS updates) the trip points are
> set too low.
There were patches floating to make this configurable. I was always
a little sceptical of them, but they exist.
> If we get a thermal event that was caused by temporary
> increased workload, temperature will drop off again when that workload
> is complete.
But none of the cpufreq governours do this. They only care about
load, not about temperature.
> For sustained workloads we'd get additional thermal events, at which
> time we make a decision "ok, we've throttled as far as we can, and
> things are still going badly, power off".
That is what the ACPI driver does when the trip point is reached.
> In the event of a failed fan or similar, shutting down is obviously
> the right thing to do, and we'd get further thermal events after
> throttling which would allow us to do so.
So you're saying processor_thermal should let the system cook
for some time first before really taking action?
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-25 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-19 19:51 latest -git: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/ipi.c:123 send_IPI_mask_bitmask+0xc3/0xe0() Vegard Nossum
2008-08-20 1:39 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-20 6:26 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-22 0:36 ` Dave Jones
2008-08-22 2:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-22 2:28 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-22 6:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-22 9:35 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-22 16:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-23 6:42 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-23 6:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-22 11:13 ` adobriyan
2008-08-24 9:20 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-24 16:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-24 17:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-24 17:22 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-24 17:45 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-24 17:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-24 18:13 ` Dave Jones
2008-08-25 18:31 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-25 18:38 ` Dave Jones
2008-08-25 18:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-25 18:54 ` Dave Jones
2008-08-25 19:39 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-25 19:50 ` Dave Jones
2008-08-25 20:36 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-08-25 20:47 ` Dave Jones
2008-08-25 21:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-25 19:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-25 19:13 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080825203649.GH26610@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox