From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Ryan Hope" <rmh3093@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [-mmotm] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:37:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080825233729.816cf182.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48f7fe350808251909g26207e7agdda6408c0b46a1ed@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:09:25 -0400 "Ryan Hope" <rmh3093@gmail.com> wrote:
> BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/1/0x00000002
> Modules linked in:
> Pid: 1, comm: swapper Tainted: G W 2.6.27-rc4-zenmmotm1 #4
> [<c057a0c7>] schedule+0x287/0x6d0
> [<c03672e6>] vsnprintf+0x3a6/0x6c0
> [<c057a92d>] schedule_timeout+0x7d/0xb0
> [<c021e0c8>] __wake_up+0x38/0x50
> [<c057a74a>] wait_for_common+0x8a/0x130
> [<c0220ab0>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x10
> [<c0237743>] call_usermodehelper_exec+0xc3/0xf0
> [<c0362ede>] kobject_uevent_env+0x37e/0x3a0
> [<c03d5921>] device_add+0x551/0x630
> [<c03d5ac3>] device_create_vargs+0xb3/0xd0
> [<c06ccc47>] microcode_intel_module_init+0x0/0x39
> [<c03d5b0b>] device_create+0x2b/0x30
> [<c0385f2e>] misc_register+0xbe/0x170
> [<c02137d1>] microcode_init+0x21/0xf0
> [<c0201336>] do_one_initcall+0x26/0x170
> [<c021e0c8>] __wake_up+0x38/0x50
> [<c0237c98>] insert_work+0x48/0x50
> [<c02380a5>] __queue_work+0x25/0x40
> [<c023812a>] queue_work_on+0x3a/0x50
> [<c06c29bf>] kernel_init+0x170/0x251
> [<c06c284f>] kernel_init+0x0/0x251
> [<c0204157>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> =======================
As a mad guess, I'd guess that someone changed get_online_cpus() so
that disables preemption (with a suitable config combination, perhaps).
Which would cause microcode_init()'s sysdev_driver_register() to run
in atomic context.
But that's just a guess - I can't immediately see any change in there
which does this. Ingo, any theories?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-26 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-26 2:09 [-mmotm] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper Ryan Hope
2008-08-26 6:37 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-08-26 7:01 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-26 8:11 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-26 8:24 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <9f8af95f0808260225u162da49aj1d6f6fd9db79499f@mail.gmail.com>
2008-08-26 9:29 ` james toy
2008-08-26 10:02 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-08-26 14:15 ` Ryan Hope
2008-08-26 14:53 ` Ryan Hope
2008-08-26 14:58 ` Ryan Hope
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080825233729.816cf182.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rmh3093@gmail.com \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox