From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] state machine based rcu
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:08:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080826160838.GA11279@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080824170949.GG6851@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:09:49AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:16:17AM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> > Btw, does STP still exist? I'd like to do some testing on real SMP
> > hardware. http://stp.testing.osdl.org/ appears to be dead.
>
> I believe that it has indeed passed on.
>
> I have occasional access to some 128-CPU machines, but they both
> currently being used for a week-long test sequence, so I won't have
> access to them for some time. Once they free up, I would be happy to
> run some short (a few hours) tests on them, given a patch stack starting
> from a Linux release (e.g., 2.6.27-rc1). Given such a patch stack, I
> can simply point the machine at it. The automated test system doesn't
> yet understand git trees. :-/
The big long test is over, so if you can send me a patch against some
Linus tree, I will see about testing your code. Assuming someone else
doesn't jump on the machines first, that is... :-/
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-26 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-21 15:27 [RFC, PATCH] state machine based rcu Manfred Spraul
2008-08-21 15:29 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-08-21 15:32 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-08-22 19:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-23 8:16 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-08-24 17:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-26 16:08 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2008-08-26 17:19 ` Manfred Spraul
2008-08-26 18:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-01 0:02 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080826160838.GA11279@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox