[PATCH][resubmit] TPM: update char dev BKL pushdown

[PATCH][resubmit] TPM: update char dev BKL pushdown

[Rajiv Andrade]

Now considering the num_opens to is_open change and the use of atomic_set
instead of atomic_dec and atomic_inc. This also includes additional comments on
tpm_open.

Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
index ae766d8..09829f3 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
@@ -954,13 +954,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_store_cancel);
 
 /*
  * Device file system interface to the TPM
+ *
+ * It's assured that the chip will be opened just once,
+ * by the check of is_open variable, which is protected
+ * by driver_lock.
  */
 int tpm_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
 	int rc = 0, minor = iminor(inode);
 	struct tpm_chip *chip = NULL, *pos;
 
-	lock_kernel();
 	spin_lock(&driver_lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(pos, &tpm_chip_list, list) {
@@ -975,34 +978,31 @@ int tpm_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 		goto err_out;
 	}
 
-	if (chip->num_opens) {
+	if (atomic_read(&chip->is_open)) {
 		dev_dbg(chip->dev, "Another process owns this TPM\n");
 		rc = -EBUSY;
 		goto err_out;
 	}
 
-	chip->num_opens++;
-	get_device(chip->dev);
+	atomic_set(&chip->is_open, 1);
+	get_device(chip->dev); /* protect from chip disappearing */
 
 	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
 
 	chip->data_buffer = kmalloc(TPM_BUFSIZE * sizeof(u8), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (chip->data_buffer == NULL) {
-		chip->num_opens--;
+		atomic_set(&chip->is_open, 0);
 		put_device(chip->dev);
-		unlock_kernel();
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
 	atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, 0);
 
 	file->private_data = chip;
-	unlock_kernel();
 	return 0;
 
 err_out:
 	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
-	unlock_kernel();
 	return rc;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_open);
@@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ int tpm_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 	file->private_data = NULL;
 	del_singleshot_timer_sync(&chip->user_read_timer);
 	atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, 0);
-	chip->num_opens--;
+	atomic_set(&chip->is_open, 0);
 	put_device(chip->dev);
 	kfree(chip->data_buffer);
 	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
@@ -1082,7 +1082,12 @@ ssize_t tpm_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
 	return ret_size;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_read);
-
+/*
+ *   Called on unloading the driver.
+ *
+ *   First part unloading the chip is done here. The remainder
+ *   is done, when the device count reaches 0, in tpm_dev_release().
+ */
 void tpm_remove_hardware(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -1231,20 +1236,16 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_register_hardware(struct device *dev, const struct tpm_vend
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&driver_lock);
-
-	list_add(&chip->list, &tpm_chip_list);
-
-	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
-
 	if (sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj, chip->vendor.attr_group)) {
-		list_del(&chip->list);
 		misc_deregister(&chip->vendor.miscdev);
 		put_device(chip->dev);
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
 	chip->bios_dir = tpm_bios_log_setup(devname);
+	spin_lock(&driver_lock);
+	list_add(&chip->list, &tpm_chip_list);
+	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
 
 	return chip;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
index e885148..7e0d3fb 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ struct tpm_chip {
 	struct device *dev;	/* Device stuff */
 
 	int dev_num;		/* /dev/tpm# */
-	int num_opens;		/* only one allowed */
+	atomic_t is_open;	/* only one allowed */
 	int time_expired;
 
 	/* Data passed to and from the tpm via the read/write calls */
-- 
1.5.4.5

Re: [PATCH][resubmit] TPM: update char dev BKL pushdown

[Alan Cox]

> +	atomic_set(&chip->is_open, 1);
> +	get_device(chip->dev); /* protect from chip disappearing */

Why not just use test_and_set_bit() ? You seem to be abusing atomic_t to
achieve this.

Re: [PATCH][resubmit] TPM: update char dev BKL pushdown

[Serge E. Hallyn]

Quoting Rajiv Andrade (srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> Now considering the num_opens to is_open change and the use of atomic_set
> instead of atomic_dec and atomic_inc. This also includes additional comments on
> tpm_open.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>

In the future, though, please do keep a more complete intro that
you always send with patch resends - because not everyone will
know the history - and a detailed changelog - since some people
do.

thanks,
-serge

> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
> index ae766d8..09829f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
> @@ -954,13 +954,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_store_cancel);
> 
>  /*
>   * Device file system interface to the TPM
> + *
> + * It's assured that the chip will be opened just once,
> + * by the check of is_open variable, which is protected
> + * by driver_lock.
>   */
>  int tpm_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
>  	int rc = 0, minor = iminor(inode);
>  	struct tpm_chip *chip = NULL, *pos;
> 
> -	lock_kernel();
>  	spin_lock(&driver_lock);
> 
>  	list_for_each_entry(pos, &tpm_chip_list, list) {
> @@ -975,34 +978,31 @@ int tpm_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  		goto err_out;
>  	}
> 
> -	if (chip->num_opens) {
> +	if (atomic_read(&chip->is_open)) {
>  		dev_dbg(chip->dev, "Another process owns this TPM\n");
>  		rc = -EBUSY;
>  		goto err_out;
>  	}
> 
> -	chip->num_opens++;
> -	get_device(chip->dev);
> +	atomic_set(&chip->is_open, 1);
> +	get_device(chip->dev); /* protect from chip disappearing */
> 
>  	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
> 
>  	chip->data_buffer = kmalloc(TPM_BUFSIZE * sizeof(u8), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (chip->data_buffer == NULL) {
> -		chip->num_opens--;
> +		atomic_set(&chip->is_open, 0);
>  		put_device(chip->dev);
> -		unlock_kernel();
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
> 
>  	atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, 0);
> 
>  	file->private_data = chip;
> -	unlock_kernel();
>  	return 0;
> 
>  err_out:
>  	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
> -	unlock_kernel();
>  	return rc;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_open);
> @@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ int tpm_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  	file->private_data = NULL;
>  	del_singleshot_timer_sync(&chip->user_read_timer);
>  	atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, 0);
> -	chip->num_opens--;
> +	atomic_set(&chip->is_open, 0);
>  	put_device(chip->dev);
>  	kfree(chip->data_buffer);
>  	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
> @@ -1082,7 +1082,12 @@ ssize_t tpm_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>  	return ret_size;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_read);
> -
> +/*
> + *   Called on unloading the driver.
> + *
> + *   First part unloading the chip is done here. The remainder
> + *   is done, when the device count reaches 0, in tpm_dev_release().
> + */
>  void tpm_remove_hardware(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -1231,20 +1236,16 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_register_hardware(struct device *dev, const struct tpm_vend
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
> 
> -	spin_lock(&driver_lock);
> -
> -	list_add(&chip->list, &tpm_chip_list);
> -
> -	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
> -
>  	if (sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj, chip->vendor.attr_group)) {
> -		list_del(&chip->list);
>  		misc_deregister(&chip->vendor.miscdev);
>  		put_device(chip->dev);
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
> 
>  	chip->bios_dir = tpm_bios_log_setup(devname);
> +	spin_lock(&driver_lock);
> +	list_add(&chip->list, &tpm_chip_list);
> +	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
> 
>  	return chip;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> index e885148..7e0d3fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ struct tpm_chip {
>  	struct device *dev;	/* Device stuff */
> 
>  	int dev_num;		/* /dev/tpm# */
> -	int num_opens;		/* only one allowed */
> +	atomic_t is_open;	/* only one allowed */
>  	int time_expired;
> 
>  	/* Data passed to and from the tpm via the read/write calls */
> -- 
> 1.5.4.5
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH][resubmit] TPM: update char dev BKL pushdown

[Serge E. Hallyn]

Quoting Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk):
> > +	atomic_set(&chip->is_open, 1);
> > +	get_device(chip->dev); /* protect from chip disappearing */
> 
> Why not just use test_and_set_bit() ? You seem to be abusing atomic_t to
> achieve this.

Good point.  Or heck just make it a simple flag.  Earlier I thought there
was a place where driver_lock was taken just to do num_opens--, and so
replacing the int num_opens with an atomic_t seemed worthwhile.  But since
is_open is a boolean and now seems to be always protected by driver_lock,
a flag seems best.

-serge

Re: [PATCH][resubmit] TPM: update char dev BKL pushdown

[Rajiv Andrade]

It was all about this section:

>       chip->data_buffer = kmalloc(TPM_BUFSIZE * sizeof(u8),
GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (chip->data_buffer == NULL) {
> -             chip->num_opens--;
> +             atomic_set(&chip->is_open, 0);
>               put_device(chip->dev);

num_opens wasn't protected by driver_lock, so we made num_opens/is_open
atomic_t. But an int seems too much for just a flag (as Serge pointed),
and the code would be cleaner if we make only this line atomic, by using
test_and_set_bit(). Thanks Alan.
I'll rewrite it.

Rajiv


On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 22:19 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk):
> > > +	atomic_set(&chip->is_open, 1);
> > > +	get_device(chip->dev); /* protect from chip disappearing */
> > 
> > Why not just use test_and_set_bit() ? You seem to be abusing atomic_t to
> > achieve this.
> 
> Good point.  Or heck just make it a simple flag.  Earlier I thought there
> was a place where driver_lock was taken just to do num_opens--, and so
> replacing the int num_opens with an atomic_t seemed worthwhile.  But since
> is_open is a boolean and now seems to be always protected by driver_lock,
> a flag seems best.
> 
> -serge
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/