From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Markku Savela <msa@moth.iki.fi>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Frustrated with capabilities..
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:58:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080829165847.GA19672@hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080828141826.GA6797@ucw.cz>
Quoting Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz):
> On Wed 2008-08-27 12:31:10, Markku Savela wrote:
> > I just want to run an exectable with limited capabilities and assumed
> > the following approach would work fine:
> >
> > 1) fork process
> > 2) in child
> >
> > 2.1 set current capabilities (eip) using cap_set_proc
> > 2.2 execve the executable.
> >
> > But it frigging does not work! Just before the execve, the result of
> > cap_to_text is
> >
> > = cap_net_bind_service+eip
> >
> > but, in the execve executable, the result is suddenly
> >
> > = cap_net_bind_service+i
> >
> > Why does the execve clear the effective and permitted capabities,
> > against my clear instructions? (I also have the prctl KEEP_CAPS set,
KEEP_CAPS prevents capability set clearing at setuid, not at exec.
> > though in this case it should be irrelevant).
> >
> > - The kernel is from ubuntu distro, 2.6.24.
> >
> > - the executable *does* *not* have any setuid/setgid bits
> >
> > - the upcoming file capabities will not be any help, because I will
> > need to start the same executable with different capabilities
> > depending on context.
They will help. The context is pI. When a file is executed, the task's
new permitted set is calculated as:
pP' = (fI&pI) | (fP & X)
So you can give /bin/foo the file capabilities:
fI=cap1,cap2,cap3
Then task 1 runs with pI=cap1, so when it executes /bin/foo it will get
pP' = cap1
Task 2 runs with pI=cap2,cap3,cap4 so when it executes /bin/foo it will
get
pP' = cap2,cap3
> Yes, you need upcoming filesystem capabilities. Binary may not
> inherit capabilities unless filesystem flags permit that.
>
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-29 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-27 9:31 Frustrated with capabilities Markku Savela
2008-08-28 14:18 ` Pavel Machek
2008-08-28 14:45 ` Markku Savela
2008-08-28 17:48 ` Theodore Tso
2008-08-28 21:03 ` David P. Quigley
2008-08-29 4:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2008-08-29 14:20 ` David P. Quigley
2008-08-29 10:18 ` Markku Savela
2008-08-29 10:47 ` James Morris
2008-08-29 14:07 ` Theodore Tso
2008-08-29 17:11 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-08-29 16:58 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080829165847.GA19672@hallyn.com \
--to=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msa@moth.iki.fi \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox