From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: buffer overflow in /proc/sys/sunrpc/transports
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:06:42 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080830190642.GC7611@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080830184422.GA9598@localhost.localdomain>
[Vegard Nossum - Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 08:44:22PM +0200]
| Hi,
|
| I noticed that something weird is going on with /proc/sys/sunrpc/transports.
| This file is generated in net/sunrpc/sysctl.c, function proc_do_xprt(). When
| I "cat" this file, I get the expected output:
|
| $ cat /proc/sys/sunrpc/transports
| tcp 1048576
| udp 32768
|
| But I think that it does not check the length of the buffer supplied by
| userspace to read(). With my original program, I found that the stack was
| being overwritten by the characters above, even when the length given to
| read() was just 1. So I have created a test program, see it at the bottom of
| this e-mail. Here is its output:
|
...
Indeed, maybe just add checking for user buffer length?
As proc_dodebug() in this file are doing. I don't think
the user would be happy with his stack burned :)
Something like:
---
Index: linux-2.6.git/net/sunrpc/sysctl.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/net/sunrpc/sysctl.c 2008-07-20 11:40:14.000000000 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.git/net/sunrpc/sysctl.c 2008-08-30 23:05:30.000000000 +0400
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ static int proc_do_xprt(ctl_table *table
return -EINVAL;
else {
len = svc_print_xprts(tmpbuf, sizeof(tmpbuf));
+ if (*lenp < len)
+ return -EFAULT;
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, buffer, len))
return -EFAULT;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-30 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-30 18:44 buffer overflow in /proc/sys/sunrpc/transports Vegard Nossum
2008-08-30 19:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2008-08-30 19:15 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-30 19:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-08-30 19:23 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-08-30 19:34 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-30 19:44 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-08-30 19:42 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-30 19:45 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-08-30 19:56 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-08-30 19:59 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-30 20:04 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-08-30 20:13 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-30 20:15 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-08-30 20:29 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-08-30 22:55 ` David Wagner
2008-08-31 8:37 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-08-31 10:30 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-08-31 10:37 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-08-30 20:20 ` David Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080830190642.GC7611@lenovo \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=gnb@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox