Re: buffer overflow in /proc/sys/sunrpc/transports

[Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>]

[Vegard Nossum - Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:13:23PM +0200]
| On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
| > [Vegard Nossum - Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:59:38PM +0200]
| > | On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
| > | > | BTW, look at this:
| > | > |
| > | > |     $ od -A x -t x1z /proc/sys/sunrpc/transports
| > | > |     000000 74 63 70 20 31 30 34 38 35 37 36 0a 75 64 70 20  >tcp 1048576.udp <
| > | > |     000010 33 32 37 36 38 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  >32768...........<
| > | > |     000020 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  >................<
| > | > |     *
| > | > |     0003e0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00                    >..........<
| > | > |     0003ea
| > | > |
| > | > | ...and:
| > | > |
| > | > |     $ strace -e trace=read cat /proc/sys/sunrpc/transports > /dev/null
| > | > |     read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0@G\316E4\0\0\0"...,
| > | > | 512) = 512
| > | > |     read(3, "tcp 1048576\nudp 32768\n\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4096) = 4074
| > | > |     read(3, "", 4096)                       = 0
| > | > |
| > | > | ...why does it have a huge return value? The output is only about 40
| > | > | bytes... why add all the \0? Would your patch also fix this?
| > | >
| > | > I think it's from strace side - it pass 4096 zero'ed buffer.
| > |
| > | "cat" passed buffer of size 4096, yes. But read() still returned 4074.
| > | It should have returned 38 or so.
| > |
| > | > At least I don't see additional issues from kernel side in buffer
| > | > filling - except from svc_print_xprts() which walk over list.
| > | > But I think sunpc guys should know details :)
| > | > Will send short-fix patch soon :)
| > |
| > | It looks like it's returning (sizeof(buffer) - x) where it really
| > | should be returning x. Maybe it's this one that should be different?
| > |
| > |         *lenp -= len;
| > |
| >
| > yes, but this is just a side effect, if we fix main error - it should
| > resolve this problem too. Did you try the fix I sent a few msgs ago?
| > (I don't have sunrpc on my machine)
| 
| Sorry, I did it now :-)
| 
|     $ uname -a
|     Linux grianne 2.6.27-rc5-00006-gbef69ea-dirty #4 SMP PREEMPT Sat
| Aug 30 22:07:18 CEST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
| 
|     $ strace -e trace=read cat /proc/sys/sunrpc/transports > /dev/null
|     read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\320
| \265\0004\0\0\0"..., 512) = 512
|     read(3, "tcp 1048576\nudp 32768\n\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4096) = 4074
|     read(3, "", 4096)                       = 0
| 
| So that problem seems to remain.

thanks - will check... (if not fall into sleep :)

| 
| 
| Vegard
| 
| -- 
| "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
| the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
| disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
| 	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
| 
		- Cyrill -