public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 22:05:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080903220546.bd673658.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080904145744.3f791ca7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:57:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 21:54:55 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 21:46:34 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > >  Apart from the lack of any
> > > login prompt on the console (sshd works), but I suspect that was a
> > > separate gift.
> > 
> > And the very first damn bisection point goes:
> > 
> > In file included from include/asm/statfs.h:11,
> >                  from include/linux/statfs.h:6,
> >                  from include/linux/vfs.h:4,
> >                  from fs/open.c:22:
> > include/asm-generic/statfs.h:20: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '__u32'
> > 
> > and that bisection breakage is going to get trotted into mainline
> > for evermore.
> 
> No it isn't because it came from dwmw2's tree and that has already been
> rewritten/rebased ...

Thank gawd for that.

This breakage spans over 1000 commits.  Not sure how that can happen in
a rebased tree, but whatever.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-04  5:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-03  9:16 linux-next: Tree for September 3 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-04  2:32 ` [PATCH] hid: fix gyration build error Randy Dunlap
2008-09-04  6:52   ` Jiri Slaby
2008-09-04  8:06     ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-04  4:42 ` linux-next: Tree for September 3 Andrew Morton
2008-09-04  4:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04  4:54   ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04  4:57     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-04  5:05       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-09-04  5:20         ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-04  6:01           ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04  7:15             ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04  7:48               ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-04  9:19               ` Alan Cox
2008-09-04  9:21               ` Alan Cox
2008-09-04 11:01               ` Alan Cox
2008-09-04 14:35               ` Alan Cox
2008-09-04  5:26         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04  5:42           ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04  5:00     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-04  5:21   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04  5:33     ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04  7:14       ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-04  8:00         ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04  8:23         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04  8:02       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04  8:25         ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04  8:37           ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04  9:03             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04  8:50           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04  8:57             ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04  9:07               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 17:45                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04 18:05                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 18:34                     ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04 20:31                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-04 20:41                         ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04 21:03                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-04 22:22                             ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04 22:45                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-04 23:17                         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-05  5:39                           ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-04 23:17                         ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04 23:25                           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 23:27                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-05 11:04                             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-05 17:49                               ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-09  4:39             ` Jesse Barnes
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-03 11:59 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-03  3:52 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080903220546.bd673658.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox