* [Patch] Check hfs_bnode_find return value
@ 2008-08-26 17:23 Eric Sesterhenn
2008-08-29 2:07 ` Roman Zippel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sesterhenn @ 2008-08-26 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zippel, linux-kernel
hi,
another bug triggered with a corrupted image, this time running fsx on
it.
[ 8898.458022] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffff8
[ 8898.458022] IP: [<c023028c>] hfs_bnode_split+0x216/0x280
[ 8898.458022] *pde = 00008067 *pte = 00000000
[ 8898.458022] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 8898.458022] Modules linked in:
[ 8898.458022]
[ 8898.458022] Pid: 30558, comm: fsx Not tainted (2.6.27-rc4-00131-g83097ac-dirty #33)
[ 8898.458022] EIP: 0060:[<c023028c>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0
[ 8898.458022] EIP is at hfs_bnode_split+0x216/0x280
[ 8898.458022] EAX: 00000002 EBX: fffffff4 ECX: 00000000 EDX: c6b48be6
[ 8898.458022] ESI: c6ac25a0 EDI: c6ac26c0 EBP: c6b48c00 ESP: c6b48bc4
[ 8898.458022] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
[ 8898.458022] Process fsx (pid: 30558, ti=c6b48000 task=c6a06700 task.ti=c6b48000)
[ 8898.458022] Stack: c6a93950 00000010 00000fd8 00000fb8 00000830 000007ac 00000000 00000822
[ 8898.458022] 00000fb8 00000200 01ff0000 00001000 00000fb8 c6ac26c0 00000fb6 c6b48c4c
[ 8898.458022] c02303ca 000000f8 c6b48c68 c6b48e70 0000000f c6ac26c0 c6a93950 00000000
[ 8898.458022] Call Trace:
[ 8898.458022] [<c02303ca>] ? hfsplus_brec_insert+0xd4/0x2bc
[ 8898.458022] [<c022d7be>] ? hfsplus_create_cat+0x30c/0x38f
[ 8898.458022] [<c013dc3a>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
[ 8898.458022] [<c017cd20>] ? check_bytes_and_report+0x21/0x8f
[ 8898.458022] [<c017d8a3>] ? __slab_alloc+0xb1/0x503
[ 8898.458022] [<c017dfc5>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x4e/0xba
[ 8898.458022] [<c06ade04>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x9d/0xab
[ 8898.458022] [<c013dc3a>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
[ 8898.458022] [<c06abe19>] ? _spin_unlock+0x27/0x3c
[ 8898.458022] [<c019ad34>] ? __mark_inode_dirty+0x12f/0x137
[ 8898.458022] [<c06ade04>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x9d/0xab
[ 8898.458022] [<c06abe19>] ? _spin_unlock+0x27/0x3c
[ 8898.458022] [<c022e3db>] ? hfsplus_create+0x35/0x7a
[ 8898.458022] [<c01889ee>] ? vfs_create+0xa6/0x114
[ 8898.458022] [<c018ac61>] ? do_filp_open+0x1ad/0x62f
[ 8898.458022] [<c06abe19>] ? _spin_unlock+0x27/0x3c
[ 8898.458022] [<c0193632>] ? alloc_fd+0xbf/0xc9
[ 8898.458022] [<c06ade04>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x9d/0xab
[ 8898.458022] [<c0193632>] ? alloc_fd+0xbf/0xc9
[ 8898.458022] [<c0180249>] ? do_sys_open+0x42/0xb8
[ 8898.458022] [<c0180301>] ? sys_open+0x1e/0x26
[ 8898.458022] [<c01038bd>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31
[ 8898.458022] =======================
[ 8898.458022] Code: c2 89 f8 66 89 55 f0 8d 55 e6 e8 63 ed ff ff 8b 56 0c 83 c4 14 85 d2 74 3f 8b 45 c4 e8 f5 f1 ff ff 31 c9 8d 55 e6 89 c3 8b 46 08 <89> 43 04 89 d8 6a 0e e8 1d ee ff ff 8b 43 04 8d 55 e6 0f c8 31
[ 8898.458022] EIP: [<c023028c>] hfs_bnode_split+0x216/0x280 SS:ESP 0068:c6b48bc4
[ 8898.458022] ---[ end trace 552e26de6e943a04 ]---
Problem is caused by not checking and propagating the return
valie of hfs_bnode_find()
Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de>
--- linux/fs/hfsplus/brec.c.orig 2008-08-26 19:18:56.000000000 +0200
+++ linux/fs/hfsplus/brec.c 2008-08-26 19:19:27.000000000 +0200
@@ -304,6 +304,8 @@ static struct hfs_bnode *hfs_bnode_split
/* update next bnode header */
if (new_node->next) {
struct hfs_bnode *next_node = hfs_bnode_find(tree, new_node->next);
+ if (IS_ERR(next_node))
+ return next_node;
next_node->prev = new_node->this;
hfs_bnode_read(next_node, &node_desc, 0, sizeof(node_desc));
node_desc.prev = cpu_to_be32(next_node->prev);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch] Check hfs_bnode_find return value
2008-08-26 17:23 [Patch] Check hfs_bnode_find return value Eric Sesterhenn
@ 2008-08-29 2:07 ` Roman Zippel
2008-09-04 12:17 ` Eric Sesterhenn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Roman Zippel @ 2008-08-29 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sesterhenn; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> --- linux/fs/hfsplus/brec.c.orig 2008-08-26 19:18:56.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux/fs/hfsplus/brec.c 2008-08-26 19:19:27.000000000 +0200
> @@ -304,6 +304,8 @@ static struct hfs_bnode *hfs_bnode_split
> /* update next bnode header */
> if (new_node->next) {
> struct hfs_bnode *next_node = hfs_bnode_find(tree, new_node->next);
> + if (IS_ERR(next_node))
> + return next_node;
> next_node->prev = new_node->this;
> hfs_bnode_read(next_node, &node_desc, 0, sizeof(node_desc));
> node_desc.prev = cpu_to_be32(next_node->prev);
Al Viro already fixed this for HFS in a better way, could you please adopt
his solution?
bye, Roman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch] Check hfs_bnode_find return value
2008-08-29 2:07 ` Roman Zippel
@ 2008-09-04 12:17 ` Eric Sesterhenn
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sesterhenn @ 2008-09-04 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roman Zippel; +Cc: linux-kernel, viro, akpm
hi,
sorry i just noticed that the mail from yesterday was broken...
* Roman Zippel (zippel@linux-m68k.org) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
>
> > --- linux/fs/hfsplus/brec.c.orig 2008-08-26 19:18:56.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux/fs/hfsplus/brec.c 2008-08-26 19:19:27.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -304,6 +304,8 @@ static struct hfs_bnode *hfs_bnode_split
> > /* update next bnode header */
> > if (new_node->next) {
> > struct hfs_bnode *next_node = hfs_bnode_find(tree, new_node->next);
> > + if (IS_ERR(next_node))
> > + return next_node;
> > next_node->prev = new_node->this;
> > hfs_bnode_read(next_node, &node_desc, 0, sizeof(node_desc));
> > node_desc.prev = cpu_to_be32(next_node->prev);
>
> Al Viro already fixed this for HFS in a better way, could you please adopt
> his solution?
This is the patch from hfs applied to hfsplus (see
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=3d10a15d6919488204bdb264050d156ced20d9aa
). Guess Al should sign this off since it is his work?
--- linux/fs/hfsplus/brec.c.orig 2008-09-03 17:00:07.000000000 +0200
+++ linux/fs/hfsplus/brec.c 2008-09-03 17:00:43.000000000 +0200
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ skip:
static struct hfs_bnode *hfs_bnode_split(struct hfs_find_data *fd)
{
struct hfs_btree *tree;
- struct hfs_bnode *node, *new_node;
+ struct hfs_bnode *node, *new_node, *next_node;
struct hfs_bnode_desc node_desc;
int num_recs, new_rec_off, new_off, old_rec_off;
int data_start, data_end, size;
@@ -235,6 +235,17 @@ static struct hfs_bnode *hfs_bnode_split
new_node->type = node->type;
new_node->height = node->height;
+ if (node->next)
+ next_node = hfs_bnode_find(tree, node->next);
+ else
+ next_node = NULL;
+
+ if (IS_ERR(next_node)) {
+ hfs_bnode_put(node);
+ hfs_bnode_put(new_node);
+ return next_node;
+ }
+
size = tree->node_size / 2 - node->num_recs * 2 - 14;
old_rec_off = tree->node_size - 4;
num_recs = 1;
@@ -248,6 +259,8 @@ static struct hfs_bnode *hfs_bnode_split
/* panic? */
hfs_bnode_put(node);
hfs_bnode_put(new_node);
+ if (next_node)
+ hfs_bnode_put(next_node);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
}
@@ -302,8 +315,7 @@ static struct hfs_bnode *hfs_bnode_split
hfs_bnode_write(node, &node_desc, 0, sizeof(node_desc));
/* update next bnode header */
- if (new_node->next) {
- struct hfs_bnode *next_node = hfs_bnode_find(tree, new_node->next);
+ if (next_node) {
next_node->prev = new_node->this;
hfs_bnode_read(next_node, &node_desc, 0, sizeof(node_desc));
node_desc.prev = cpu_to_be32(next_node->prev);
----- End forwarded message -----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-04 12:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-08-26 17:23 [Patch] Check hfs_bnode_find return value Eric Sesterhenn
2008-08-29 2:07 ` Roman Zippel
2008-09-04 12:17 ` Eric Sesterhenn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox