From: aris <arozansk@redhat.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dzickus@redhat.com,
Thomas.Mingarelli@hp.com, ak@linux.intel.com, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:49:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080904144956.GJ28636@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48BFF0C0.7060208@redhat.com>
> Peter -- good question. The HP systems with this HW will use the hpwdt
> driver in place of the default nmi watchdog. When the HW detects a
> problem, the HW will generate a single NMI that the driver will handle.
> The driver doesn't want the NMI to be rejected due to a reason code.
> I'm sure that Thomas Mingarelli, who is cc'd, can provide further
> details.
it's not the first time this is asked. I think it's needed for some kernel
debuggers as well: make sure a function is called before anything else
when a NMI happens. something that the notifier chain can't do.
> From our quick conversation as well, you raised an interesting point
> about oprofile, kgdb, and other subsystems that use the NMI notifier
> chains -- they may be impacted by the NMI callback.
>
> Don (dzickus) or Aris, do you have any thoughts on how to get around the
> second issue? We could check to see if anything is registered on the
> notifier chain and the fail to register the callback.
or call the notifier chain in case it indentifies it's a unexpected NMI?
--
Aristeu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-04 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-04 13:07 [PATCH RFC] NMI Re-introduce un[set]_nmi_callback Prarit Bhargava
2008-09-04 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-04 14:29 ` Prarit Bhargava
2008-09-04 14:49 ` aris [this message]
2008-09-04 14:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 15:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-04 15:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 15:52 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-04 17:20 ` Don Zickus
2008-09-04 17:52 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-04 18:26 ` Don Zickus
2008-09-04 18:47 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-04 19:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-09-04 20:00 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-04 20:01 ` Mingarelli, Thomas
2008-09-04 20:19 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-04 20:21 ` Mingarelli, Thomas
2008-09-04 20:53 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-04 21:22 ` Don Zickus
2008-09-04 20:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-09-04 21:05 ` Mingarelli, Thomas
2008-09-04 21:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-09-04 21:24 ` Don Zickus
2008-09-04 21:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-09-05 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-05 10:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-05 9:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-05 14:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-09-05 14:18 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080904144956.GJ28636@redhat.com \
--to=arozansk@redhat.com \
--cc=Thomas.Mingarelli@hp.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox