public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, snakebyte@gmx.de
Subject: Re: __getblk infinite loop
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 22:38:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080904223836.54fbabb1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080905032411.GB13208@hash.localnet>

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 23:24:11 -0400 Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Eric Sesterhenn and I were puzzling over a lockup found by his fsfuzzer.
> 
> sb_bread() calls __getblk, which says:
> 
> /*
>  * __getblk will locate (and, if necessary, create) the buffer_head
>  * which corresponds to the passed block_device, block and size. The
>  * returned buffer has its reference count incremented.
>  *
>  * __getblk() cannot fail - it just keeps trying.  If you pass it an
>  * illegal block number, __getblk() will happily return a buffer_head
>  * which represents the non-existent block.  Very weird.
>  *
>  * __getblk() will lock up the machine if grow_dev_page's try_to_free_buffers()
>  * attempt is failing.  FIXME, perhaps?
>  */
> 
> In fact the following will cause an infinite loop when mounting omfs 
> loopback (on 32 bit x86 at least):
> 
> diff --git a/fs/omfs/inode.c b/fs/omfs/inode.c
> index a95fe59..80eacc8 100644
> --- a/fs/omfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/omfs/inode.c
> @@ -413,6 +413,15 @@ static int omfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>  	sector_t start;
>  	int ret = -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if (1) {
> +		sector_t foo = 0x1d4000004ULL;
> +
> +		sb_set_blocksize(sb, 2048);
> +		bh = sb_bread(sb, foo);
> +		brelse(bh);
> +		goto end;
> +	}
> +
>  	save_mount_options(sb, (char *) data);
>  
>  	sbi = kzalloc(sizeof(struct omfs_sb_info), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> What's supposed to happen here?  I would have thought that sb_bread
> would realize foo was outside the block dev and bail out, but instead
> it just gets stuck.  Do I need to bounds-check anything passed to
> sb_bread?

That loop does lock up on people occasionally - last time was in isofs,
because it had done an insane set_blocksize() earlier on.

Yes, it's always a case of garbage in, garbage out (or nothing out, as
the case may be).

No, it's not particularly programmer-friendly behaviour.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-05  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-05  3:24 __getblk infinite loop Bob Copeland
2008-09-05  5:38 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-09-05  9:20   ` Eric Sesterhenn
2008-09-10 12:33     ` Bob Copeland
2008-09-05 14:58   ` Bob Copeland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080904223836.54fbabb1.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
    --cc=snakebyte@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox