From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, snakebyte@gmx.de
Subject: Re: __getblk infinite loop
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 22:38:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080904223836.54fbabb1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080905032411.GB13208@hash.localnet>
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 23:24:11 -0400 Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Eric Sesterhenn and I were puzzling over a lockup found by his fsfuzzer.
>
> sb_bread() calls __getblk, which says:
>
> /*
> * __getblk will locate (and, if necessary, create) the buffer_head
> * which corresponds to the passed block_device, block and size. The
> * returned buffer has its reference count incremented.
> *
> * __getblk() cannot fail - it just keeps trying. If you pass it an
> * illegal block number, __getblk() will happily return a buffer_head
> * which represents the non-existent block. Very weird.
> *
> * __getblk() will lock up the machine if grow_dev_page's try_to_free_buffers()
> * attempt is failing. FIXME, perhaps?
> */
>
> In fact the following will cause an infinite loop when mounting omfs
> loopback (on 32 bit x86 at least):
>
> diff --git a/fs/omfs/inode.c b/fs/omfs/inode.c
> index a95fe59..80eacc8 100644
> --- a/fs/omfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/omfs/inode.c
> @@ -413,6 +413,15 @@ static int omfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> sector_t start;
> int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> + if (1) {
> + sector_t foo = 0x1d4000004ULL;
> +
> + sb_set_blocksize(sb, 2048);
> + bh = sb_bread(sb, foo);
> + brelse(bh);
> + goto end;
> + }
> +
> save_mount_options(sb, (char *) data);
>
> sbi = kzalloc(sizeof(struct omfs_sb_info), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> What's supposed to happen here? I would have thought that sb_bread
> would realize foo was outside the block dev and bail out, but instead
> it just gets stuck. Do I need to bounds-check anything passed to
> sb_bread?
That loop does lock up on people occasionally - last time was in isofs,
because it had done an insane set_blocksize() earlier on.
Yes, it's always a case of garbage in, garbage out (or nothing out, as
the case may be).
No, it's not particularly programmer-friendly behaviour.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-05 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-05 3:24 __getblk infinite loop Bob Copeland
2008-09-05 5:38 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-09-05 9:20 ` Eric Sesterhenn
2008-09-10 12:33 ` Bob Copeland
2008-09-05 14:58 ` Bob Copeland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080904223836.54fbabb1.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=snakebyte@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox