From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@zugschlus.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.26.3 mount process looping on ext3 rw remount
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:22:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080905112221.8be36263.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080905113901.GA2756@torres.zugschlus.de>
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 13:39:02 +0200 Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@zugschlus.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 06:35:28PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Please try to get a kernel profile while it's happening. oprofile
> > maybe, or just the plain old timer-based profiler. There's some info
> > in Documentation/basic_profiling.txt.
>
> I'll boot my next kernel with profile=2.
>
> > Actually, a simple alternative is to hit sysrq-P five or ten times.
> > Most of the resulting stack traces will point back at where the CPU is
> > stuck.
>
> Where are they written to? "P" in a sysrqd telnet session does not
> result in anything being written to the kernel log or to dmesg.
alt-sysrq-p from the attached keyboard.
When operating remotely, use `echo p > /proc/sysrq-trigger'.
The output will be in /var/log/messages and is accessible via
`dmesg -s 1000000'.
Please avoid email client wordwrapping when sending these logs. 99% of
people do this and it makes the text very hard to read.
> > This gets a bit hit-or-miss if you have multiple CPUs, because the
> > sysrq-p trace can land on the wrong CPU. We recently added a sysrq-l
> > which will generate a trace on all CPUS.
>
> "l" results in the SysRq HELP being written to the kernel log, so I
> guess that "recently" means "not yet in 2.6.26.3".
ok
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-05 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-23 8:42 2.6.26.3 mount process looping on ext3 rw remount Marc Haber
2008-08-26 1:35 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-05 11:39 ` Marc Haber
2008-09-05 18:22 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080905112221.8be36263.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mh+linux-kernel@zugschlus.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox