From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org,
arjan@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blacklist DMAR on Intel G31/G33 chipsets
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 20:34:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080905183459.GC14258@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1220518477.2985.163.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
* David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
> Some BIOSes (the Intel DG33BU, for example) wrongly claim to have DMAR
> when they don't. Avoid the resulting crashes when it doesn't work as
> expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
> ---
>
> This time, I build-tested it with CONFIG_DMAR actually enabled. Sorry.
> I'd still be grateful if someone could test it on a DG33BU with the
> old BIOS though, since I've killed mine. I tested the DMI version, but
> not this one.
ok - fixing this makes sense. I have two worries about this patch.
Firstly, the quirk is keyed off an ACPI capability which is quite bad if
someone boots with ACPI off. (which is still quite possible) The DMAR is
PCI enumerated so there's nothing inherently ACPI about this. A DMI
quirk (which will work even if ACPI is disabled) looks more robust.
Secondly, keying off the PCI ID and assuming a BIOS bug based on the
presence of an ACPI table can indeed get incoherent results as you
suspect. It's better to single out the specific BIOS as long as the DMI
info is specific enough. Even if that PCI ID is never supposed to be
combined with VT-d (because, obviously, VT-d needs a different chipset),
it's just a sloppy concept in general.
The fact that you've already tested the DMI version and cannot test the
new version is one more reason to favor the first patch.
Could you please resend the initial DMI version of the
drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c commit stand-alone, not embedded in a 'misc'
pull request, and with Jesse Cc:-ed as well? Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-05 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-01 20:14 Misc fixes for 2.6.27 David Woodhouse
2008-09-01 22:32 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-01 22:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-01 23:01 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-01 23:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-02 6:19 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-02 8:23 ` David Woodhouse
2008-09-03 10:53 ` Blacklist DMAR on Intel G31/G33 chipsets David Woodhouse
2008-09-03 12:09 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-03 12:22 ` David Woodhouse
2008-09-04 8:54 ` [PATCH] " David Woodhouse
2008-09-05 18:34 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-09-05 18:47 ` David Woodhouse
2008-09-06 15:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-07 8:20 ` David Woodhouse
2008-09-07 15:35 ` [2.6.27 PATCH] " David Woodhouse
2008-09-09 18:39 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080905183459.GC14258@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox