From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752668AbYIFFXk (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 01:23:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751478AbYIFFXb (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 01:23:31 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:46563 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751076AbYIFFXb (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 01:23:31 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 22:23:20 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Hiroshi DOYU Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add missing macro argument for devm_release_* family Message-Id: <20080905222320.36eb3bfa.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080906.081841.03994201.Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com> References: <1220662823-19106-1-git-send-email-Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com> <20080905185254.78706060.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080906.081841.03994201.Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:18:41 +0300 (EEST) Hiroshi DOYU wrote: > From: "ext Andrew Morton" > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add missing macro argument for devm_release_* family > Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 18:52:54 -0700 > > > On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 04:00:23 +0300 Hiroshi DOYU wrote: > > > > > From: ext Hiroshi DOYU > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi DOYU > > > --- > > > include/linux/ioport.h | 4 ++-- > > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h > > > index 22d2115..c813c63 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/ioport.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h > > > @@ -158,9 +158,9 @@ extern struct resource * __devm_request_region(struct device *dev, > > > struct resource *parent, resource_size_t start, > > > resource_size_t n, const char *name); > > > > > > -#define devm_release_region(start,n) \ > > > +#define devm_release_region(dev,start,n) \ > > > __devm_release_region(dev, &ioport_resource, (start), (n)) > > > -#define devm_release_mem_region(start,n) \ > > > +#define devm_release_mem_region(dev,start,n) \ > > > __devm_release_region(dev, &iomem_resource, (start), (n)) > > > > > > extern void __devm_release_region(struct device *dev, struct resource *parent, > > > > um, OK. > > > > But none of these things appear to have any callers anywhere. Why > > don't we just delete it all? > > Not sure for others, but at least, I am using this in my developing > driver;) yeah, I was just trolling ;) I queued this fix for 2.6.27.