From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] x86: io-apic - code style cleaning for setup_IO_APIC_irqs
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 23:44:13 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080906194413.GD23729@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080906193820.GC23729@lenovo>
[Cyrill Gorcunov - Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 11:38:20PM +0400]
| [Yinghai Lu - Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 12:16:28PM -0700]
| | On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
| | > [Maciej W. Rozycki - Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 07:45:08PM +0100]
| | > | On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| | > |
| | > | > Ingo, how about the following approach? We don't introduce new
| | > | > functions but rather srink the code by new printout form.
| | > |
| | > | Honestly, this one should probably use sprintf() or suchlike to avoid the
| | > | mess of printk() calls building a line of output from pieces. It's quite
| | > | easy to calculate here what the maximum size of the buffer required could
| | > | be and automatic arrays can have variable size, so no need for the hassle
| | > | of heap management. Calls to printk() without a trailing newline should
| | > | be avoided where possible as it messes up logging priority if a message
| | > | pops up from an interrupt inbetween.
| | > |
| | > | Maciej
| | > |
| | >
| | > The easiest way would be just print this info on separate
| | > lines like
| | >
| | > IO-APIC (apicid-pin) 1-1 not connected
| | >
| | > and just drop all this troubles :)
| | >
| | > I'm not sure how much memory we need for every io-apic
| | > pins - iirc there only 32 redirection entry so it could
| | > be about 32 bytes from stack would be enough. Will take
| | > a look. Thanks Maciej! Ingo?
| |
| | no. some system could have 3 or 4 ioapic controller, and every one
| | have 24...(like three mcp55/io55)
| | 4*24
| |
| | or old system have 1 8111 and 7 8132. will have 32 + 7*2*7
| |
| | YH
| |
|
| Didn't really understand all numbers :)
| We have
| 24 io-apic route entries
| 128 io-apic maximum in quantity
|
| so the worst (hardly possible if ever) is when on last io-apic
| all pins are wrong. So for this case we would need
|
| (3 + 1) * ((10 + 1) + (13 + 1)) = 100
|
| where
| 3 - strlen("127") - max io-apic number
| 10 - Sum(strlen(0)+...+strlen(9)) - pin numbers
| 13 - same sum for two-digit numbers
| +1 number - either "-" sign or " "
|
| 100 bytes to print not connected pins. Ugh :-)
|
| - Cyrill -
But if one day hardware changed - we'll be in troubles :)
So I think better would be just use Ingo's suggestion
about to separate apic/pin iterator and function body.
- Cyrill -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-06 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080904183748.950151853@gmail.com>
2008-09-04 18:37 ` [patch 1/3] x86: io-apic - use ARRAY_SIZE macro Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-05 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 18:37 ` [patch 2/3] x86: io-apic - declare irq_cfg_lock for SPARSE_IRQ only Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-05 8:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 18:37 ` [patch 3/3] x86: io-apic - code style cleaning for setup_IO_APIC_irqs Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-05 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-05 13:49 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-05 18:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-05 18:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-05 18:33 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-05 18:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-05 19:15 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-06 10:15 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-06 13:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-08 0:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-08 4:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-08 4:20 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-08 4:38 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-08 5:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-08 5:17 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-06 18:45 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-09-06 18:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-06 20:02 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-09-07 10:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-07 15:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-07 16:04 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-06 19:04 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-06 19:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-06 19:19 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-06 19:38 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-06 19:44 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2008-09-06 20:08 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-09-06 20:13 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080906194413.GD23729@lenovo \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox