From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@infradead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Dan Hecht <dhecht@vmware.com>, Garrett Smith <garrett@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 00:40:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080906224016.GA9229@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809061351170.3117@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> "expect" is an unsigned char. There are absolutely _zero_ issues with
> overflow, underflow, random phases of the moon, madness levels or
> anything else. But yes, it does look like Ingo screwed up when adding
> that final check, since expect was already decremented at the end of
> the loop.
>
> Ingo? Did you actually test it?
hm, yes, that's my brown paper bag fault, sorry.
I did that addition in tip/x86/tsc and posted it to you and i did test
it immediately - and i noticed that i never saw the fast-calibration
message i expected to see. I even pasted the boot log over irc yesterday
and i still have it:
*> [ 0.000] TSC: PIT calibration deviates from PMTIMER: 738839 846296.
*> [ 0.000] TSC: Using PIT calibration value
*> [ 0.000] Detected 738.839 MHz processor.
*> does not seem to trigger anywhere
i wanted to debug that problem straight after i worked down my 800+
mails post-vacation mbox :-/ Which state i reached about 2 hours ago so
i'm now free - the fix is below.
i _think_ that the quality of calibration should now be pretty OK with
latest -git. The clever fast calibration stuff could be .28 material.
And/or we could change the 5x 50msec calibration to 3x 30msec right now,
the precision is still plenty and the 90 msec is then replaced with your
fast-calibrate method anyway on proper boxes. Hm?
Ingo
------------------->
>From 5df45515512436a808d3476a90e83f2efb022422 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 23:55:40 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86, tsc calibration: fix
my brown paperbag day ...
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index 6dab90f..4847a92 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static unsigned long quick_pit_calibrate(void)
/*
* Make sure we can rely on the second TSC timestamp:
*/
- if (!pit_expect_msb(--expect))
+ if (!pit_expect_msb(expect))
goto failed;
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-06 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-04 15:18 [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-04 15:18 ` [RFC patch 1/4] x86: TSC: define the PIT latch value separate Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-04 15:18 ` [RFC patch 2/4] x86: TSC: separate hpet/pmtimer calculation out Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-04 15:18 ` [RFC patch 3/4] x86: TSC: use one set of reference variables Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-04 15:18 ` [RFC patch 4/4] x86: TSC make the calibration loop smarter Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-04 15:36 ` [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 15:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 16:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 16:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 16:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 17:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 18:07 ` Alan Cox
2008-09-04 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 18:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-04 20:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 20:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 20:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 21:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 21:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 21:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 21:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 21:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-05 22:18 ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-05 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-06 20:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-06 20:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-06 20:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-06 21:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 21:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-06 21:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 22:40 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-09-06 20:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 21:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-07 6:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-09-06 20:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-06 21:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 21:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-06 21:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 21:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 20:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 21:38 ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-04 21:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 22:09 ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-04 17:39 ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-04 17:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 18:31 ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-04 18:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-04 21:00 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080906224016.GA9229@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dhecht@vmware.com \
--cc=garrett@vmware.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox