public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroups: fix probable race with put_css_set[_taskexit] and find_css_set
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 23:17:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080910061717.GA6301@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830809092231h90712a6mc95b81229d64d6bc@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:31:24PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> >
> > What are you trying to solve here with this change?  I agree, it does
> > seem a bit "chaotic" :)
> 
> There's a place in cgroups that uses kref_put() to release an object;
> the release function *then* takes a write-lock and removes the object
> from a lookup table; it could race with another thread that searches
> the lookup table (while holding a read-lock) and does kref_get() on
> the same object.

Ick, yeah that's not good.

What about the way everyone else solves this, grab the lock before you
call kref_put()?

> The current fix is for the release function to recheck inside the lock
> that the object's refcount is still zero, and only actually
> unlink/free it if so. And actually I've just realised that this isn't
> actually even safe, since the thread that just acquired the object
> could kref_put() it almost immediately, which would leave two threads
> both trying to unlink/free the object.

Yeah, don't do that :)

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-10  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-19  6:29 [PATCH] cgroups: fix probable race with put_css_set[_taskexit] and find_css_set Lai Jiangshan
2008-09-10  0:28 ` Paul Menage
2008-09-10  2:18   ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-09-10  2:40     ` Li Zefan
2008-09-10  3:11     ` Paul Menage
2008-09-10  5:01     ` Greg KH
2008-09-10  5:31       ` Paul Menage
2008-09-10  6:17         ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-09-10  6:25           ` Li Zefan
2008-09-10  6:29             ` Greg KH
2008-09-10 15:03               ` Paul Menage
2008-09-12 15:58                 ` Greg KH
2008-09-12 19:33                   ` Paul Menage

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080910061717.GA6301@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox