From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: avoid unnecessary low zone allocation in AMD IOMMU's alloc_coherent
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:48:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080910124822.GG6329@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080910213155M.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:38:11PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:03:10 +0200
> Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> wrote:
> > It needs a fix anyway and the
> > right solution here is to fall back to one of the software iommu
> > implementations. The stackable dma_ops patches I have currently in work
> > will do exactly that.
>
> I'm not sure you need the stackable dma_ops support. Calgary IOMMU had
> the same problem and already solved it with dma_ops-per-device option.
We need stackable dma_ops anyway for paravirt IOMMU support in KVM. And
they will fix this issue too.
> > These flags are already removed in the dma_alloc_coherent function which
> > calls this one. Further I think in the case of a remapping IOMMU like
>
> Not true about x86/tip/iommu. dma_alloc_coherent in dma-mapping.h does
> that so that swiotlb and pci-nommu don't need the gfp hack. Clearing
> the gfp flags is much simpler than setting up the flags correctly
> mainly because of the fallback device, setting up the flags is really
> difficult.
Yes, dma_alloc_coherent in dma-mapping.h clears the flags. And this
function also calls ops->alloc_coherent which points to the AMD IOMMUs
alloc_coherent function if the driver is in place.
Joerg
--
| AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
Research | General Partner authorized to represent:
Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
| General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-10 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-10 11:19 [PATCH] x86: avoid unnecessary low zone allocation in AMD IOMMU's alloc_coherent FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 11:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 12:03 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 12:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 12:38 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 12:48 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2008-09-10 13:03 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 13:10 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 13:37 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 13:53 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 14:24 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 14:38 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 14:45 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-11 9:10 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-11 13:36 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 14:39 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 14:52 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 15:09 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 15:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 16:29 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 17:05 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 17:15 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 17:25 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080910124822.GG6329@amd.com \
--to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox