From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754119AbYIJNTt (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:19:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751767AbYIJNTl (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:19:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:35069 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751707AbYIJNTl (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:19:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 06:18:55 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Parag Warudkar Cc: linux-kernel , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , htejun@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: sysfs - kill owner field from attribute Message-ID: <20080910131855.GA15808@suse.de> References: <20080910053724.GA3632@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:01:48AM -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > > Why one arch, normally we do it one subsystem at a time :) > > Mostly because I at least want to compile test and preferably boot > with the changes - which I can on x86/64. > And somewhat in the hope that some one else will help with changes on > the arches he/she is able to test! > > > > > Either way, thanks for doing this, I'll gladly take your fixed up > > version and work to clean up the rest if you don't want to do it. > > > > Not that I don't want to do it - just that I can't test it on the > other arches - so please feel free. > The sooner it goes away the better. Cross-compilers are your friend, Andrew beat that into me finally after years of telling me this :) resend your patch and I'll run with it. thanks, greg k-h