From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: avoid unnecessary low zone allocation in AMD IOMMU's alloc_coherent
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:29:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080910152918.GD24392@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080911000936R.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:09:43AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:52:49 +0200
> Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:39:00PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >
> > > btw, in tip/x86/iommu, GART's alloc_coherent always does virtual
> > > mappings to allocate a size-aligned memory (as DMA-mapping.txt
> > > defines).
> > >
> > > Because someone strongly insisted, I modified GART's alloc_coherent to
> > > do so but as I said again and again, it's completely meaningless (only
> > > POWER IOMMU does it and drivers don't depend on such requirement).
> > >
> > > I guess that it would be better to do virtual mappings only when
> > > necessary as the current mainline does since GART I/O space is
> > > precious in some systems. But I don't care much. What's your opinion
> > > (as a AMD developer)?
> >
> > Very true. My original rewrite did the mapping only when necessary too.
> > What were the reasons to do the mapping always?
>
> As I said above, it's for allocating a size-aligned memory. Look at
> the description of pci_alloc_consistent in DMA-mapping.txt:
>
> The cpu return address and the DMA bus master address are both
> guaranteed to be aligned to the smallest PAGE_SIZE order which
> is greater than or equal to the requested size. This invariant
> exists (for example) to guarantee that if you allocate a chunk
> which is smaller than or equal to 64 kilobytes, the extent of the
> buffer you receive will not cross a 64K boundary.
>
> You can't do this with __get_free_pages easily (you need some hacks to
> do this). You can do this via iommu_area_alloc() for free.
What hacks do you need with __get_free_pages? The memory it returns is
_always_ aligned at its size.
>
> Well, actually you agreed with adding such requirement (though I said
> again and again that it's totally meaningless...):
The other possible way is removing this requirement from the
documentation. But if the spec has this requirement the code _has_ to
fullfill it, even if its meaningless for most drivers.
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/24/162
This message stated nothing about _always_ map GART alloc_coherent
allocations using the aperture.
Joerg
--
| AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
Research | General Partner authorized to represent:
Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
| General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-10 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-10 11:19 [PATCH] x86: avoid unnecessary low zone allocation in AMD IOMMU's alloc_coherent FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 11:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 12:03 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 12:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 12:38 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 12:48 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 13:03 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 13:10 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 13:37 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 13:53 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 14:24 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 14:38 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 14:45 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-11 9:10 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-11 13:36 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 14:39 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 14:52 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 15:09 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 15:29 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2008-09-10 16:29 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 17:05 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 17:15 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 17:25 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080910152918.GD24392@amd.com \
--to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox