From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: avoid unnecessary low zone allocation in AMD IOMMU's alloc_coherent
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:25:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080910172533.GB32286@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080911021457K.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 02:15:22AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:05:04 +0200
> Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 01:29:54AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:29:18 +0200
> > > Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > What hacks do you need with __get_free_pages? The memory it returns is
> > > > _always_ aligned at its size.
> > >
> > > Is it guaranteed (documented somewhere) ?
> >
> > I don't know if there is a formal definition for it. It is documented in
> > some books about the Linux kernel (I read this in some book the first
> > time). This alignment results from the buddy algorithm the page alloctor
> > uses. You can definitly rely on that.
>
> I meant, if it's not documented as a guaranteed feature (not just the
> characteristic of the current code), it could change any time.
It will never change. I am sure about this. A lot of code relys on
this like the HugeTLBfs implementations for example. In fact, it may be
possible that the requirement to the dma_alloc_coherent function derive
from this behavior of the Linux page allocator (to not break anything
when the dma api was introduced).
Joerg
--
| AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
Research | General Partner authorized to represent:
Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
| General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-10 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-10 11:19 [PATCH] x86: avoid unnecessary low zone allocation in AMD IOMMU's alloc_coherent FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 11:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 12:03 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 12:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 12:38 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 12:48 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 13:03 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 13:10 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 13:37 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 13:53 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 14:24 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 14:38 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 14:45 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-11 9:10 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-11 13:36 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 14:39 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 14:52 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 15:09 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 15:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 16:29 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 17:05 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-10 17:15 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-09-10 17:25 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080910172533.GB32286@amd.com \
--to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox