From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: "Zhao, Yu" <yu.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>, Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 v2] PCI: support ARI capability
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:07:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080910200721.GI2772@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7A25B56E4BE99C4283EB931CD1A40E110181CAF7@pdsmsx414.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 03:48:04PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
> >I agree with this improvement to the help text. But a further question
> >is whether ARI even merits its own user-visible config option. Is it
> >worth having yet another choice for users? When would someone want ARI
> >but not SR-IOV?
>
> ARI is an independent PCI Express extended capability. Multi-function devices supporting this capability may use it to track dependency between different functions and assign function group numbers to these functions.
>
> Another reason to keep this separated with SR-IOV is that after ARI is enabled, PCI Express Endpoint may have non-zero slot number (device number), which is different from traditional PCI Express Endpoint.
Let me ask the question slightly differently: Why would someone want to
turn the capability off? Is it just to save a few hundred bytes in the
kernel image, or is there some hardware that won't work? Or some other
reason I haven't thought of?
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-10 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-01 11:20 [PATCH 2/4 v2] PCI: support ARI capability Zhao, Yu
2008-09-01 15:27 ` Alex Chiang
2008-09-01 15:50 ` Roland Dreier
2008-09-10 7:48 ` Zhao, Yu
2008-09-10 18:42 ` Roland Dreier
2008-09-10 20:07 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2008-09-10 7:35 ` Zhao, Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080910200721.GI2772@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=yu.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox